2002PubMedRequires access

[The lingual region upper airway CT scan of obstructive sleep apnea patients].

Shuhua Li, Hongjin Shi, Sheng Qü, Zequan Hua, Xin Dong, Weidong Dong

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the lingual region upper airway CT scan results of OSAS patients and normal adults to explore if there are upper airway stricture in OSAS patients and the reason of stricture. METHODS: 59 patients with OSAS and 57 normal adults were included in the study. CT evaluated the lingual region upper airway with the use of a Philips Tomoscan AV Expander E1 spiral scanner. The shapes of lingual region upper airway were observed. The area and the dimensions of lingual region was studied, and the thickness of retropharyngeal and lateral pharyngeal tissue were evaluated too. The another focus area was tongue, and the evaluated data included the tongue width, genioglossus width, hyogolssus width, tongue length and tongue area. RESULTS: The data comparative results of OSAS and normal groups were as follows: the right to left diameter and area of OSAS patients' lingual region upper airways were less than those of normal adults, the thickness of lateral pharyngeal, tongue width, genioglossus width, hyogolssus width and tongue area were more than those of normal adults. And there were not obviously difference between OSAS patients and normal adults in tongue length, anterior-to-posterior dimension and thickness of retropharyngeal wall tissue of upper airway. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that there are obviously difference between the patients with OSAS and normal adult in lingual upper airway CT scan measure. And the anatomic stricture of lingual upper airway is one of the etiology of OSAS. The main reasons of stricture are increasing of thickness of lateral pharyngeal, tongue width, genioglossus width, hyogolssus width and tongue area.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the lingual region upper airway CT scan results of OSAS patients and normal adults to explore if there are upper airway stricture in OSAS patients and the reason of stricture. METHODS: 59 patients with OSAS and 57 normal adults were included in the study. CT evaluated the lingual region upper airway with the use of a Philips Tomoscan AV Expander E1 spiral scanner. The shapes of lingual region upper airway were observed. The area and the dimensions of lingual region was studied, and the thickness of retropharyngeal and lateral pharyngeal tissue were evaluated too. The another focus area was tongue, and the evaluated data included the tongue width, genioglossus width, hyogolssus width, tongue length and tongue area. RESULTS: The data comparative results of OSAS and normal groups were as follows: the right to left diameter and area of OSAS patients' lingual region upper airways were less than those of normal adults, the thickness of lateral pharyngeal, tongue width, genioglossus width, hyogolssus width and tongue area were more than those of normal adults. And there were not obviously difference between OSAS patients and normal adults in tongue length, anterior-to-posterior dimension and thickness of retropharyngeal wall tissue of upper airway. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that there are obviously difference between the patients with OSAS and normal adult in lingual upper airway CT scan measure. And the anatomic stricture of lingual upper airway is one of the etiology of OSAS. The main reasons of stricture are increasing of thickness of lateral pharyngeal, tongue width, genioglossus width, hyogolssus width and tongue area.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the lingual region upper airway CT scan results of OSAS patients and normal adults to explore if there are upper airway stricture in OSAS patients and the reason of stricture. METHODS: 59 patients with OSAS and 57 normal adults were included in the study. CT evaluated the lingual region upper airway with the use of a Philips Tomoscan AV Expander E1 spiral scanner. The shapes of lingual region upper airway were observed. The area and the dimensions of lingual region was studied, and the thickness of retropharyngeal and lateral pharyngeal tissue were evaluated too. The another focus area was tongue, and the evaluated data included the tongue width, genioglossus width, hyogolssus width, tongue length and tongue area. RESULTS: The data comparative results of OSAS and normal groups were as follows: the right to left diameter and area of OSAS patients' lingual region upper airways were less than those of normal adults, the thickness of lateral pharyngeal, tongue width, genioglossus width, hyogolssus width and tongue area were more than those of normal adults. And there were not obviously difference between OSAS patients and normal adults in tongue length, anterior-to-posterior dimension and thickness of retropharyngeal wall tissue of upper airway. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that there are obviously difference between the patients with OSAS and normal adult in lingual upper airway CT scan measure. And the anatomic stricture of lingual upper airway is one of the etiology of OSAS. The main reasons of stricture are increasing of thickness of lateral pharyngeal, tongue width, genioglossus width, hyogolssus width and tongue area.

Key concepts: Tongue, Airway, Medicine, Genioglossus, Obstructive sleep apnea, Anatomy, Epiglottis, Orthodontics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The lingual region upper airway CT scan of obstructive sleep apnea patients]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens