2006Journal of Tropical MedicineRequires access

Assessment of Five Different HIV ELISA Kits

Luo Hai-ling

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of five different ELISA kits for the testing of HIV in blood samples. Methods ELISA kits obtained from local (Kit-A, B, and E) and oversea (Kit-C and D) manufactures were used in this study. Bloods, either obtained from the volunteers or provided by the Health Ministry, were used for the testing of HIV. The following parameters were compared: the compliance rate, positive identification rate,false positive identification rate, stability,detection limit and pro-zone phenomena.Results All 5 ELISA kits achieved national standard with a compliance rate of 100%. For the standard samples, the positive identification rate was 100%.The positive identification rate of the 21 658 blood donor samples was 0.01%.ELISA kit-C had a lower false positive identification rate than the ELISA Kit-D, A, B and E (P0.05). The accuracy (5.98%) and stability (5.93%) of the ELISA Kit-C were lower than the ELISA Kit-A,B,D,and E (P0.05). Although the detection limit of the ELISA Kit-A, B and E is 0.125NCU, the false positive identification rate for this ELISA kit is high. Pro-zone effect was not observed in the ELISA Kit-C. Conclusion All the ELISA kits used in this study meet the national standard. The false positive identification rate of the three locally made ELISA kits was higher than the two imported ELISA kits,the minimum detectable limit of these locally made ELISA kits was lower than the other two kits. The ELISA Kit-C should be used for the screening of HIV.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of five different ELISA kits for the testing of HIV in blood samples. Methods ELISA kits obtained from local (Kit-A, B, and E) and oversea (Kit-C and D) manufactures were used in this study. Bloods, either obtained from the volunteers or provided by the Health Ministry, were used for the testing of HIV. The following parameters were compared: the compliance rate, positive identification rate,false positive identification rate, stability,detection limit and pro-zone phenomena.Results All 5 ELISA kits achieved national standard with a compliance rate of 100%. For the standard samples, the positive identification rate was 100%.The positive identification rate of the 21 658 blood donor samples was 0.01%.ELISA kit-C had a lower false positive identification rate than the ELISA Kit-D, A, B and E (P0.05). The accuracy (5.98%) and stability (5.93%) of the ELISA Kit-C were lower than the ELISA Kit-A,B,D,and E (P0.05). Although the detection limit of the ELISA Kit-A, B and E is 0.125NCU, the false positive identification rate for this ELISA kit is high. Pro-zone effect was not observed in the ELISA Kit-C. Conclusion All the ELISA kits used in this study meet the national standard. The false positive identification rate of the three locally made ELISA kits was higher than the two imported ELISA kits,the minimum detectable limit of these locally made ELISA kits was lower than the other two kits. The ELISA Kit-C should be used for the screening of HIV.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of five different ELISA kits for the testing of HIV in blood samples. Methods ELISA kits obtained from local (Kit-A, B, and E) and oversea (Kit-C and D) manufactures were used in this study. Bloods, either obtained from the volunteers or provided by the Health Ministry, were used for the testing of HIV. The following parameters were compared: the compliance rate, positive identification rate,false positive identification rate, stability,detection limit and pro-zone phenomena.Results All 5 ELISA kits achieved national standard with a compliance rate of 100%. For the standard samples, the positive identification rate was 100%.The positive identification rate of the 21 658 blood donor samples was 0.01%.ELISA kit-C had a lower false positive identification rate than the ELISA Kit-D, A, B and E (P0.05). The accuracy (5.98%) and stability (5.93%) of the ELISA Kit-C were lower than the ELISA Kit-A,B,D,and E (P0.05). Although the detection limit of the ELISA Kit-A, B and E is 0.125NCU, the false positive identification rate for this ELISA kit is high. Pro-zone effect was not observed in the ELISA Kit-C. Conclusion All the ELISA kits used in this study meet the national standard. The false positive identification rate of the three locally made ELISA kits was higher than the two imported ELISA kits,the minimum detectable limit of these locally made ELISA kits was lower than the other two kits. The ELISA Kit-C should be used for the screening of HIV.

Key concepts: Medicine, Christian ministry, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Detection limit, False positive rate, Immunology, Chromatography, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessment of Five Different HIV ELISA Kits — Research Paper | ScholarLens