2014Journal of Southwest University of Science and TechnologyRequires access

Discussion upon the Judicial Review of the Administrative Emergency Action

Hu Peng

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Differing with the judicial review of normal administrative action,the administrative emergency action needs to seek the source of legality by referring to legislative intention and basic value of the rule of the law. As to the substantivity issue of the judicial review of the administrative action,there is a need to expand the current scope of the accepted case of the administrative litigation,develop the reasonable standard of review,ascertain the legal status of emergency management legislation and establish diverse and plural standards of proof. In the aspect of procedural issues,it is essential to make clear the jurisdiction of the court as well as qualification of parties in actions,design limitation of action with public and private interest balanced,extend the application scope of the alteration judgment,which aims to fully secure the counterpart's interests on the premise of assuring the efficiency in dealing with public crisis by administrative bodies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Differing with the judicial review of normal administrative action,the administrative emergency action needs to seek the source of legality by referring to legislative intention and basic value of the rule of the law. As to the substantivity issue of the judicial review of the administrative action,there is a need to expand the current scope of the accepted case of the administrative litigation,develop the reasonable standard of review,ascertain the legal status of emergency management legislation and establish diverse and plural standards of proof. In the aspect of procedural issues,it is essential to make clear the jurisdiction of the court as well as qualification of parties in actions,design limitation of action with public and private interest balanced,extend the application scope of the alteration judgment,which aims to fully secure the counterpart's interests on the premise of assuring the efficiency in dealing with public crisis by administrative bodies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Differing with the judicial review of normal administrative action,the administrative emergency action needs to seek the source of legality by referring to legislative intention and basic value of the rule of the law. As to the substantivity issue of the judicial review of the administrative action,there is a need to expand the current scope of the accepted case of the administrative litigation,develop the reasonable standard of review,ascertain the legal status of emergency management legislation and establish diverse and plural standards of proof. In the aspect of procedural issues,it is essential to make clear the jurisdiction of the court as well as qualification of parties in actions,design limitation of action with public and private interest balanced,extend the application scope of the alteration judgment,which aims to fully secure the counterpart's interests on the premise of assuring the efficiency in dealing with public crisis by administrative bodies.

Key concepts: Principle of legality, Judicial review, Premise, Legislature, Scope (computer science), Action (physics), Jurisdiction, Administrative law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discussion upon the Judicial Review of the Administrative Emergency Action — Research Paper | ScholarLens