2016The ATA Journal of Legal Tax ResearchRequires access

Recognition of Passive Activity Losses in a Complete Redemption of S Corporation Stock

Claire Y. Nash

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Under Section 302(b)(3), a taxpayer who redeems all of the stock he owns in an S corporation is treated as having surrendered his stock in a fully taxable exchange. The taxpayer generally recognizes the gain, or loss, realized on the exchange. Moreover, if the interest he redeems is an interest in a passive activity, Section 469(g) re-characterizes a loss on the exchange, and suspended passive activity losses (PAL) from the activity, as losses not from a passive activity, thus freeing up the suspended losses. However, when the taxpayer and the S corporation are related parties, Section 469(g)(1)(B) prohibits recognition of suspended PAL until the S corporation disposes of the “interest acquired” in a taxable transaction. Following a redemption, disposition of the “interest acquired” is not literally possible. Consequently, taxpayers question whether related-party S corporation shareholders lose the ability to recognize suspended PAL when they redeem their stock. For several years, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Tax Division has requested guidance from the Treasury Department regarding this question and listed this issue as the top priority item affecting S corporation taxation. The AICPA posits that following a 302(b)(3) redemption, suspended PAL of related-party shareholders disappear. Is the AICPA's literal application of the statute the correct approach? The legal analysis herein answers the question raised by the AICPA and taxpayers and provides guidance to Treasury in drafting administrative authority that is consistent with existing statutes and the legislative history of Section 469. Although Section 469(g)(1)(B) is problematic for related-party S corporation shareholders, their suspended PAL do not disappear. Section 469(g)(1)(B) postpones the recognition of suspended PAL in accordance with the aggregate approach when there is a complete redemption of a related-party S corporation shareholder's interest under Section 302(b)(3).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT Under Section 302(b)(3), a taxpayer who redeems all of the stock he owns in an S corporation is treated as having surrendered his stock in a fully taxable exchange. The taxpayer generally recognizes the gain, or loss, realized on the exchange. Moreover, if the interest he redeems is an interest in a passive activity, Section 469(g) re-characterizes a loss on the exchange, and suspended passive activity losses (PAL) from the activity, as losses not from a passive activity, thus freeing up the suspended losses. However, when the taxpayer and the S corporation are related parties, Section 469(g)(1)(B) prohibits recognition of suspended PAL until the S corporation disposes of the “interest acquired” in a taxable transaction. Following a redemption, disposition of the “interest acquired” is not literally possible. Consequently, taxpayers question whether related-party S corporation shareholders lose the ability to recognize suspended PAL when they redeem their stock. For several years, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Tax Division has requested guidance from the Treasury Department regarding this question and listed this issue as the top priority item affecting S corporation taxation. The AICPA posits that following a 302(b)(3) redemption, suspended PAL of related-party shareholders disappear. Is the AICPA's literal application of the statute the correct approach? The legal analysis herein answers the question raised by the AICPA and taxpayers and provides guidance to Treasury in drafting administrative authority that is consistent with existing statutes and the legislative history of Section 469. Although Section 469(g)(1)(B) is problematic for related-party S corporation shareholders, their suspended PAL do not disappear. Section 469(g)(1)(B) postpones the recognition of suspended PAL in accordance with the aggregate approach when there is a complete redemption of a related-party S corporation shareholder's interest under Section 302(b)(3).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT Under Section 302(b)(3), a taxpayer who redeems all of the stock he owns in an S corporation is treated as having surrendered his stock in a fully taxable exchange. The taxpayer generally recognizes the gain, or loss, realized on the exchange. Moreover, if the interest he redeems is an interest in a passive activity, Section 469(g) re-characterizes a loss on the exchange, and suspended passive activity losses (PAL) from the activity, as losses not from a passive activity, thus freeing up the suspended losses. However, when the taxpayer and the S corporation are related parties, Section 469(g)(1)(B) prohibits recognition of suspended PAL until the S corporation disposes of the “interest acquired” in a taxable transaction. Following a redemption, disposition of the “interest acquired” is not literally possible. Consequently, taxpayers question whether related-party S corporation shareholders lose the ability to recognize suspended PAL when they redeem their stock. For several years, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Tax Division has requested guidance from the Treasury Department regarding this question and listed this issue as the top priority item affecting S corporation taxation. The AICPA posits that following a 302(b)(3) redemption, suspended PAL of related-party shareholders disappear. Is the AICPA's literal application of the statute the correct approach? The legal analysis herein answers the question raised by the AICPA and taxpayers and provides guidance to Treasury in drafting administrative authority that is consistent with existing statutes and the legislative history of Section 469. Although Section 469(g)(1)(B) is problematic for related-party S corporation shareholders, their suspended PAL do not disappear. Section 469(g)(1)(B) postpones the recognition of suspended PAL in accordance with the aggregate approach when there is a complete redemption of a related-party S corporation shareholder's interest under Section 302(b)(3).

Key concepts: Taxable income, Taxpayer, Corporation, Treasury, Statute, Shareholder, Law, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Recognition of Passive Activity Losses in a Complete Redemption of S Corporation Stock — Research Paper | ScholarLens