2005Chinese Clinical OncologyRequires access

Development of quality of life questionnaire for cancer patients QLQ-52 and the evaluation of questionnaire's quality

YU Shi-yin

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective:To develop a self-assessed questionnaire of quality of life QLQ-52 suitable for the people of Chinese culture background.Methods:We surveyed 133 cases of cancer patients to evaluate the quality of QLQ-52 by reliability, validity, responsiveness and feasibility to reflect the quality of the questionnaire.Results:The new questionnaire composed of 52 entries was formed by 6 domains which were physical, psychological, independent, social and environmental relations, spirit support and satisfactory degree. The patients' reliability Pearson correlation was 0.334(P0.01),split-half reliability was 0.9242, Cronbach's coefficient was 0.9404. The content validity was 94.00%, construct validity showed that percentage of cumulative is 0.87, The Pearson coefficient of criterionrelated validity was 0.574(P0.01). The responsiveness was evaluated by the difference of QOL of pre/during and post treatment which was significant (P0.05). The feasibility was evaluated by completed rate, average completed time and the median time which were 93.66%, 14.3 minutes, and 12 minutes.Conclusion:The reliability, validity, responsiveness and feasibility of QLQ-52 are practical in medical clinic. The QLQ-52 may be used widely by the medical clinic in China to evaluate the QOL of cancer patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To develop a self-assessed questionnaire of quality of life QLQ-52 suitable for the people of Chinese culture background.Methods:We surveyed 133 cases of cancer patients to evaluate the quality of QLQ-52 by reliability, validity, responsiveness and feasibility to reflect the quality of the questionnaire.Results:The new questionnaire composed of 52 entries was formed by 6 domains which were physical, psychological, independent, social and environmental relations, spirit support and satisfactory degree. The patients' reliability Pearson correlation was 0.334(P0.01),split-half reliability was 0.9242, Cronbach's coefficient was 0.9404. The content validity was 94.00%, construct validity showed that percentage of cumulative is 0.87, The Pearson coefficient of criterionrelated validity was 0.574(P0.01). The responsiveness was evaluated by the difference of QOL of pre/during and post treatment which was significant (P0.05). The feasibility was evaluated by completed rate, average completed time and the median time which were 93.66%, 14.3 minutes, and 12 minutes.Conclusion:The reliability, validity, responsiveness and feasibility of QLQ-52 are practical in medical clinic. The QLQ-52 may be used widely by the medical clinic in China to evaluate the QOL of cancer patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To develop a self-assessed questionnaire of quality of life QLQ-52 suitable for the people of Chinese culture background.Methods:We surveyed 133 cases of cancer patients to evaluate the quality of QLQ-52 by reliability, validity, responsiveness and feasibility to reflect the quality of the questionnaire.Results:The new questionnaire composed of 52 entries was formed by 6 domains which were physical, psychological, independent, social and environmental relations, spirit support and satisfactory degree. The patients' reliability Pearson correlation was 0.334(P0.01),split-half reliability was 0.9242, Cronbach's coefficient was 0.9404. The content validity was 94.00%, construct validity showed that percentage of cumulative is 0.87, The Pearson coefficient of criterionrelated validity was 0.574(P0.01). The responsiveness was evaluated by the difference of QOL of pre/during and post treatment which was significant (P0.05). The feasibility was evaluated by completed rate, average completed time and the median time which were 93.66%, 14.3 minutes, and 12 minutes.Conclusion:The reliability, validity, responsiveness and feasibility of QLQ-52 are practical in medical clinic. The QLQ-52 may be used widely by the medical clinic in China to evaluate the QOL of cancer patients.

Key concepts: Cronbach's alpha, Medicine, Reliability (semiconductor), Quality of life (healthcare), Construct validity, Content validity, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, Physical therapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Development of quality of life questionnaire for cancer patients QLQ-52 and the evaluation of questionnaire's quality — Research Paper | ScholarLens