2014•The Chinese Journal of Human SexualityRequires access

The clinical applicability of five syphilis serology detection methods

Liu Wanl

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the sensitivity and specificity of five kinds of different syphilis serology detection methods,to select an efficient and accurate detection method for reliable test results in clinical application. Methods: 386 syphilis- positive serum samples from patients diagnosed and 264 serum samples from healthy individuals in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2013,respectively using enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay( ELISA),toluidine red heating serum test( TRUST),rapid plasma reagin test( RPR),reponema pallidum particle agglutination test( TPPA) and Treponema pallidum hemagglutination test( TPHA) for positive serum and healthy serum samples testing. Results: The sensitivity of ELISA and TPPA was higher,97. 67% and 97. 41% respectively,with no significant difference( χ2= 1. 124,P 0. 05); sensitivity of ELISA and TPPA were higher than TRUST and RPR method( P 0. 05); the sensitivity of TPHA was slightly less than that of ELISA and TPPA,with no significant difference( χ2= 1. 012,0. 947,P 0. 05); there was no statistically significant difference between each two of the five kinds of serological detection methods( P 0. 05). Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA and TPPA methods are good. For syphilis screening or clinical diagnosis,ELISA and TRUST( or RPR)can be used for dual screen,before being confirmed by TPPA.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives: To analyze the sensitivity and specificity of five kinds of different syphilis serology detection methods,to select an efficient and accurate detection method for reliable test results in clinical application. Methods: 386 syphilis- positive serum samples from patients diagnosed and 264 serum samples from healthy individuals in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2013,respectively using enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay( ELISA),toluidine red heating serum test( TRUST),rapid plasma reagin test( RPR),reponema pallidum particle agglutination test( TPPA) and Treponema pallidum hemagglutination test( TPHA) for positive serum and healthy serum samples testing. Results: The sensitivity of ELISA and TPPA was higher,97. 67% and 97. 41% respectively,with no significant difference( χ2= 1. 124,P 0. 05); sensitivity of ELISA and TPPA were higher than TRUST and RPR method( P 0. 05); the sensitivity of TPHA was slightly less than that of ELISA and TPPA,with no significant difference( χ2= 1. 012,0. 947,P 0. 05); there was no statistically significant difference between each two of the five kinds of serological detection methods( P 0. 05). Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA and TPPA methods are good. For syphilis screening or clinical diagnosis,ELISA and TRUST( or RPR)can be used for dual screen,before being confirmed by TPPA.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives: To analyze the sensitivity and specificity of five kinds of different syphilis serology detection methods,to select an efficient and accurate detection method for reliable test results in clinical application. Methods: 386 syphilis- positive serum samples from patients diagnosed and 264 serum samples from healthy individuals in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2013,respectively using enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay( ELISA),toluidine red heating serum test( TRUST),rapid plasma reagin test( RPR),reponema pallidum particle agglutination test( TPPA) and Treponema pallidum hemagglutination test( TPHA) for positive serum and healthy serum samples testing. Results: The sensitivity of ELISA and TPPA was higher,97. 67% and 97. 41% respectively,with no significant difference( χ2= 1. 124,P 0. 05); sensitivity of ELISA and TPPA were higher than TRUST and RPR method( P 0. 05); the sensitivity of TPHA was slightly less than that of ELISA and TPPA,with no significant difference( χ2= 1. 012,0. 947,P 0. 05); there was no statistically significant difference between each two of the five kinds of serological detection methods( P 0. 05). Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA and TPPA methods are good. For syphilis screening or clinical diagnosis,ELISA and TRUST( or RPR)can be used for dual screen,before being confirmed by TPPA.

Key concepts: Rapid plasma reagin, Serology, Syphilis, Medicine, Treponema, Significant difference, Syphilis Serodiagnosis, Hemagglutination assay

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The clinical applicability of five syphilis serology detection methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens