Performance comparison between 2-D scramjet inlet and 3-D sidewall compression scramjet inlet
Zhang Kun-yuan
Abstract
Zhang Kun-yuan
Abstract
Under the same constraints,a conventional 2-D scramjet inlet and a 3-D sidewall compression scramjet inlet were designed by using the recently developed advanced methodology.The flow field structure and overall performance were studied comparatively and numerically at Ma=4,5,6.The results indicate that,the flow field distortion of 2-D scramjet inlet was much weaker than that of the sidewall compression scramjet inlet.The mass capture ratio of 2-D hypersonic inlet was more greatly affected by incoming Mach numbers than that of the sidewall compression inlet.Numerical simulation shows that,the 2-D inlet was superior to the sidewall compression inlet at the design point,while under off-design points,especially at the starting Mach number,the performance of the sidewall compression inlet was obviously superior to the two-dimensional inlet.Under the equivalent compression state,the drag characteristic of the sidewall compression inlet was superior to that of the two-dimensional inlet,while the lift force of the 2-D dimensional inlet was greater than that of the sidewall compression inlet.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Under the same constraints,a conventional 2-D scramjet inlet and a 3-D sidewall compression scramjet inlet were designed by using the recently developed advanced methodology.The flow field structure and overall performance were studied comparatively and numerically at Ma=4,5,6.The results indicate that,the flow field distortion of 2-D scramjet inlet was much weaker than that of the sidewall compression scramjet inlet.The mass capture ratio of 2-D hypersonic inlet was more greatly affected by incoming Mach numbers than that of the sidewall compression inlet.Numerical simulation shows that,the 2-D inlet was superior to the sidewall compression inlet at the design point,while under off-design points,especially at the starting Mach number,the performance of the sidewall compression inlet was obviously superior to the two-dimensional inlet.Under the equivalent compression state,the drag characteristic of the sidewall compression inlet was superior to that of the two-dimensional inlet,while the lift force of the 2-D dimensional inlet was greater than that of the sidewall compression inlet.
Key concepts: Inlet, Scramjet, Mach number, Ramjet, Mechanics, Compression (physics), Supersonic speed, Materials science