2008•Journal of Aerospace PowerRequires access

Performance comparison between 2-D scramjet inlet and 3-D sidewall compression scramjet inlet

Zhang Kun-yuan

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Under the same constraints,a conventional 2-D scramjet inlet and a 3-D sidewall compression scramjet inlet were designed by using the recently developed advanced methodology.The flow field structure and overall performance were studied comparatively and numerically at Ma=4,5,6.The results indicate that,the flow field distortion of 2-D scramjet inlet was much weaker than that of the sidewall compression scramjet inlet.The mass capture ratio of 2-D hypersonic inlet was more greatly affected by incoming Mach numbers than that of the sidewall compression inlet.Numerical simulation shows that,the 2-D inlet was superior to the sidewall compression inlet at the design point,while under off-design points,especially at the starting Mach number,the performance of the sidewall compression inlet was obviously superior to the two-dimensional inlet.Under the equivalent compression state,the drag characteristic of the sidewall compression inlet was superior to that of the two-dimensional inlet,while the lift force of the 2-D dimensional inlet was greater than that of the sidewall compression inlet.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Under the same constraints,a conventional 2-D scramjet inlet and a 3-D sidewall compression scramjet inlet were designed by using the recently developed advanced methodology.The flow field structure and overall performance were studied comparatively and numerically at Ma=4,5,6.The results indicate that,the flow field distortion of 2-D scramjet inlet was much weaker than that of the sidewall compression scramjet inlet.The mass capture ratio of 2-D hypersonic inlet was more greatly affected by incoming Mach numbers than that of the sidewall compression inlet.Numerical simulation shows that,the 2-D inlet was superior to the sidewall compression inlet at the design point,while under off-design points,especially at the starting Mach number,the performance of the sidewall compression inlet was obviously superior to the two-dimensional inlet.Under the equivalent compression state,the drag characteristic of the sidewall compression inlet was superior to that of the two-dimensional inlet,while the lift force of the 2-D dimensional inlet was greater than that of the sidewall compression inlet.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Under the same constraints,a conventional 2-D scramjet inlet and a 3-D sidewall compression scramjet inlet were designed by using the recently developed advanced methodology.The flow field structure and overall performance were studied comparatively and numerically at Ma=4,5,6.The results indicate that,the flow field distortion of 2-D scramjet inlet was much weaker than that of the sidewall compression scramjet inlet.The mass capture ratio of 2-D hypersonic inlet was more greatly affected by incoming Mach numbers than that of the sidewall compression inlet.Numerical simulation shows that,the 2-D inlet was superior to the sidewall compression inlet at the design point,while under off-design points,especially at the starting Mach number,the performance of the sidewall compression inlet was obviously superior to the two-dimensional inlet.Under the equivalent compression state,the drag characteristic of the sidewall compression inlet was superior to that of the two-dimensional inlet,while the lift force of the 2-D dimensional inlet was greater than that of the sidewall compression inlet.

Key concepts: Inlet, Scramjet, Mach number, Ramjet, Mechanics, Compression (physics), Supersonic speed, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance comparison between 2-D scramjet inlet and 3-D sidewall compression scramjet inlet — Research Paper | ScholarLens