2014Chinese Journal of Interventional CardiologyRequires access

Clinical effectiveness and safety evaluation for the shift from clopidogrel to ticagrelor in patients with low clopidogrel response

Liu Ra

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the effectiveness and safety of two switching modalities from clopidogrel to ticagrelor with or without a loading starting dose in patients with low clopidogrel response and acute coronary syndrome(ACS). Methods In this prospective study, 154 ACS patients nonresponsive to clopidogrel were classifi ed at the doctor's discretion to loading dose(ticagrelor starting dose 180 mg, followed by 90 mg bid, n=72) or regular dose group(ticagrelor 90 mg bid, n=82). The primary effi cacy end point was ADP-induced platelet aggregation. The secondary end points were cardiovascular death,myocardial infarction(MI), stroke and the drug adverse events. Results The platelet reactivity of the loading dose group is lower than that of the regular dose group on day 3(17.6±7.2 vs. 25.7±18.3, P=0.008),but non-significant at 30th day. Ticagrelor-related dyspnea was more often in the loading dose group than the regular group(19.4% vs. 12.2%, P=0.001). Most dyspnea instances were mild, ticagrelor was discontinued due to dyspnea in only 2 patients in the loading dose group. No signifi cant difference in therates of bleeding was found between the two starting dose groups. Conclusions In low or non-responders of clopidogrel, compared with a regular maintenance dosage, switching to ticargrelor with a loading dose can achieve rapid early antiplatelet effect, without increased risk of bleeding, but with more mild dyspnea episodes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the effectiveness and safety of two switching modalities from clopidogrel to ticagrelor with or without a loading starting dose in patients with low clopidogrel response and acute coronary syndrome(ACS). Methods In this prospective study, 154 ACS patients nonresponsive to clopidogrel were classifi ed at the doctor's discretion to loading dose(ticagrelor starting dose 180 mg, followed by 90 mg bid, n=72) or regular dose group(ticagrelor 90 mg bid, n=82). The primary effi cacy end point was ADP-induced platelet aggregation. The secondary end points were cardiovascular death,myocardial infarction(MI), stroke and the drug adverse events. Results The platelet reactivity of the loading dose group is lower than that of the regular dose group on day 3(17.6±7.2 vs. 25.7±18.3, P=0.008),but non-significant at 30th day. Ticagrelor-related dyspnea was more often in the loading dose group than the regular group(19.4% vs. 12.2%, P=0.001). Most dyspnea instances were mild, ticagrelor was discontinued due to dyspnea in only 2 patients in the loading dose group. No signifi cant difference in therates of bleeding was found between the two starting dose groups. Conclusions In low or non-responders of clopidogrel, compared with a regular maintenance dosage, switching to ticargrelor with a loading dose can achieve rapid early antiplatelet effect, without increased risk of bleeding, but with more mild dyspnea episodes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the effectiveness and safety of two switching modalities from clopidogrel to ticagrelor with or without a loading starting dose in patients with low clopidogrel response and acute coronary syndrome(ACS). Methods In this prospective study, 154 ACS patients nonresponsive to clopidogrel were classifi ed at the doctor's discretion to loading dose(ticagrelor starting dose 180 mg, followed by 90 mg bid, n=72) or regular dose group(ticagrelor 90 mg bid, n=82). The primary effi cacy end point was ADP-induced platelet aggregation. The secondary end points were cardiovascular death,myocardial infarction(MI), stroke and the drug adverse events. Results The platelet reactivity of the loading dose group is lower than that of the regular dose group on day 3(17.6±7.2 vs. 25.7±18.3, P=0.008),but non-significant at 30th day. Ticagrelor-related dyspnea was more often in the loading dose group than the regular group(19.4% vs. 12.2%, P=0.001). Most dyspnea instances were mild, ticagrelor was discontinued due to dyspnea in only 2 patients in the loading dose group. No signifi cant difference in therates of bleeding was found between the two starting dose groups. Conclusions In low or non-responders of clopidogrel, compared with a regular maintenance dosage, switching to ticargrelor with a loading dose can achieve rapid early antiplatelet effect, without increased risk of bleeding, but with more mild dyspnea episodes.

Key concepts: Ticagrelor, Medicine, Clopidogrel, Loading dose, Maintenance dose, Acute coronary syndrome, Myocardial infarction, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical effectiveness and safety evaluation for the shift from clopidogrel to ticagrelor in patients with low clopidogrel response — Research Paper | ScholarLens