Treatment of Ureteral Calculis:Comparison Between Ureteroscopy with Holmium YAG Laser Lithotripsy and Extracorporeal Shock Wove Lithotripsy
An Zhong
Abstract
An Zhong
Abstract
Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL) for ureteral calculi.Methods Eighty patients underwent ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy including 42 patients with calculi 1 cm or greater and 38 patients with calculi less than 1 cm in diameter.Eighty-two patients underwent ESWL,including 42 patients with calculi 1 cm or greater and 40 patents with calculi less than 1 cm.The operation time,stone-free rate and incidence rate of complications were compared between the 2 groups.Results The mean oeration time of ureteroscopy with holmium;YAG laser lithotripsy for calculi 1 cm or greater and less than 1 cm was(56.0±2.3) min and (39.0±1.8) min respectively,which were shorter than(73.0±4.5) min and(54.0±2.1) min with ESWL(both P0.01).The stone-free rate after 1 months in patints with 1 cm or greater stone was 92.9% for ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotrlpsy.It was higher than 65% with ESWL(P0.01).As for calculi less than 1 cm,the stone-free rate with holmium:YAG laser lithotrlpsy and ESWL were 89.5% and 83.3% respectively(P0.05).The complication rate was 3.75% in the group of ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy,while in the ESWL group no complication occurred.Conclusion Our study demonstrates that ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for calculi 1 cm or greater in diameter and middle.distal ureteral calculi is more efective than ESWL,but no diference between the 2 groups for calculi less than 1 cm.ESWL can be used as the first-line therapy for calculi less than 1 cm in diameter and proximal ureteral calculi.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL) for ureteral calculi.Methods Eighty patients underwent ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy including 42 patients with calculi 1 cm or greater and 38 patients with calculi less than 1 cm in diameter.Eighty-two patients underwent ESWL,including 42 patients with calculi 1 cm or greater and 40 patents with calculi less than 1 cm.The operation time,stone-free rate and incidence rate of complications were compared between the 2 groups.Results The mean oeration time of ureteroscopy with holmium;YAG laser lithotripsy for calculi 1 cm or greater and less than 1 cm was(56.0±2.3) min and (39.0±1.8) min respectively,which were shorter than(73.0±4.5) min and(54.0±2.1) min with ESWL(both P0.01).The stone-free rate after 1 months in patints with 1 cm or greater stone was 92.9% for ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotrlpsy.It was higher than 65% with ESWL(P0.01).As for calculi less than 1 cm,the stone-free rate with holmium:YAG laser lithotrlpsy and ESWL were 89.5% and 83.3% respectively(P0.05).The complication rate was 3.75% in the group of ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy,while in the ESWL group no complication occurred.Conclusion Our study demonstrates that ureteroscopy with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for calculi 1 cm or greater in diameter and middle.distal ureteral calculi is more efective than ESWL,but no diference between the 2 groups for calculi less than 1 cm.ESWL can be used as the first-line therapy for calculi less than 1 cm in diameter and proximal ureteral calculi.
Key concepts: Ureteroscopy, Medicine, Lithotripsy, Holmium, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, Laser lithotripsy, Surgery, Complication