2014Wuhan Daxue xuebao. Yixue banRequires access

Meta-Analysis of Epidural Analgesia Efficacy and Safety of Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine After Cesarean in China

Zhang Xing-gu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the epidural analgesia efficacy and safety of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine after cesarean.Methods:We searched six databases.Meta-analysis was used to evaluate the data extracted from 1990 to 2011published papers in China on the epidural analgesia efficacy and safety of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine after cesarean.Results:Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria.The analysis of all eight RCTs showed there was no difference of postoperative analgesia effect between the levobupivacaine and ropivacaine groups(P=0.13).Compared with levobupivacaine group,ropivacaine group showed weaker lower limb motion block(P0.001)and less complications(P=0.001).Conclusion:Based on existing evidence,there was similar postoperative analgesia effect by levobupivacaine and ropivacaine,but ropivacaine administration had weaker lower limb motion block and less complications as compared with levobupivacaine.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To evaluate the epidural analgesia efficacy and safety of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine after cesarean.Methods:We searched six databases.Meta-analysis was used to evaluate the data extracted from 1990 to 2011published papers in China on the epidural analgesia efficacy and safety of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine after cesarean.Results:Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria.The analysis of all eight RCTs showed there was no difference of postoperative analgesia effect between the levobupivacaine and ropivacaine groups(P=0.13).Compared with levobupivacaine group,ropivacaine group showed weaker lower limb motion block(P0.001)and less complications(P=0.001).Conclusion:Based on existing evidence,there was similar postoperative analgesia effect by levobupivacaine and ropivacaine,but ropivacaine administration had weaker lower limb motion block and less complications as compared with levobupivacaine.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To evaluate the epidural analgesia efficacy and safety of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine after cesarean.Methods:We searched six databases.Meta-analysis was used to evaluate the data extracted from 1990 to 2011published papers in China on the epidural analgesia efficacy and safety of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine after cesarean.Results:Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria.The analysis of all eight RCTs showed there was no difference of postoperative analgesia effect between the levobupivacaine and ropivacaine groups(P=0.13).Compared with levobupivacaine group,ropivacaine group showed weaker lower limb motion block(P0.001)and less complications(P=0.001).Conclusion:Based on existing evidence,there was similar postoperative analgesia effect by levobupivacaine and ropivacaine,but ropivacaine administration had weaker lower limb motion block and less complications as compared with levobupivacaine.

Key concepts: Levobupivacaine, Ropivacaine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Surgery, Analgesic

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Meta-Analysis of Epidural Analgesia Efficacy and Safety of Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine After Cesarean in China — Research Paper | ScholarLens