2010Journal of Medical ForumRequires access

Comparison of Efficacy of Thrombolytic Therapy versus Anticoagulant Therapy in Treatment of Pulmonary Thromboembolism

Ding Junhong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of thrombolytic therapy with Urokinase versus anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-heparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism(PE).Methods Clinical data of 48 patients with PE were retrospectively analyzed.Results Heart rate and breathing rate of the thrombolysis group and anticoagulation group decreased significantly after therapy.PaO2 and PaCO2 decreased significantly as well,but the anticoagulation group was less marked than the thrombolysis group(P0.05).The total effective rates of the thrombolysis group and anticoagulation group were respectively 96.2% and 88.5%,total effectiveness of the two groups compared,having a significant difference(P0.05).Conclusion The therapeutic efficacy of thrombolytic therapy with Urokinase is higher than that of anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-heparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of thrombolytic therapy with Urokinase versus anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-heparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism(PE).Methods Clinical data of 48 patients with PE were retrospectively analyzed.Results Heart rate and breathing rate of the thrombolysis group and anticoagulation group decreased significantly after therapy.PaO2 and PaCO2 decreased significantly as well,but the anticoagulation group was less marked than the thrombolysis group(P0.05).The total effective rates of the thrombolysis group and anticoagulation group were respectively 96.2% and 88.5%,total effectiveness of the two groups compared,having a significant difference(P0.05).Conclusion The therapeutic efficacy of thrombolytic therapy with Urokinase is higher than that of anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-heparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of thrombolytic therapy with Urokinase versus anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-heparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism(PE).Methods Clinical data of 48 patients with PE were retrospectively analyzed.Results Heart rate and breathing rate of the thrombolysis group and anticoagulation group decreased significantly after therapy.PaO2 and PaCO2 decreased significantly as well,but the anticoagulation group was less marked than the thrombolysis group(P0.05).The total effective rates of the thrombolysis group and anticoagulation group were respectively 96.2% and 88.5%,total effectiveness of the two groups compared,having a significant difference(P0.05).Conclusion The therapeutic efficacy of thrombolytic therapy with Urokinase is higher than that of anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-heparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Key concepts: Urokinase, Medicine, Thrombolysis, Pulmonary embolism, Anticoagulant therapy, Heparin, Anticoagulant, Clinical efficacy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Efficacy of Thrombolytic Therapy versus Anticoagulant Therapy in Treatment of Pulmonary Thromboembolism — Research Paper | ScholarLens