2007•PubMedRequires access

[Diagnose and treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome].

Jianbo Zhou, Xuping Xiao, Jihua Wang, Gaoxin Li, Weijia Kong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the diagnose and treatment of severe OSAHS with distinction of different extent. METHOD: All 256 severe OSAHS patients were divided into two groups according to sleep apnea hypopnea index (AHI): group one (severe group), 40 < AHI < 65; group two (extra severe group), AHI > or = 65. All patients were underwent CPAP treatment for at least one week before modified UPPP in general anesthesia. UPPP and (or) nasal septum plasty or partial inferior turbinectomy were operated in one stage if tracheotomy was conducted. If tracheotomy were not conducted, the patient was only accepted UPPP under general anesthesia. The other operations to remove the multi block factors were operated in local anesthesia. RESULT: In 198 group one patients, there were 169 patients accepted UPPP in general anesthesia without tracheotomy, the other 29 patients were conducted with tracheotomy. The tracheotomy rate was 14.6%. The total effective cure rate was 85.9%. In all 58 group two patients, tracheotomy were conducted, and the total effective cure rate was 63.8%. The complication rate of all the two groups' patients was 3.5%. After three weeks,the uvulas decurtated from(4.89 +/- 0.58) cm to (3.12 +/- 0.46)cm. CONCLUSION: It is important to divide the severe OSAHS patients into severe group and extra severe group because the treatments were different. Not all the severe OSAHS patients need tracheotomy. There were advantages to retain the uvula in UPPP and patients' life quality was improved with uvula reserved.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To explore the diagnose and treatment of severe OSAHS with distinction of different extent. METHOD: All 256 severe OSAHS patients were divided into two groups according to sleep apnea hypopnea index (AHI): group one (severe group), 40 < AHI < 65; group two (extra severe group), AHI > or = 65. All patients were underwent CPAP treatment for at least one week before modified UPPP in general anesthesia. UPPP and (or) nasal septum plasty or partial inferior turbinectomy were operated in one stage if tracheotomy was conducted. If tracheotomy were not conducted, the patient was only accepted UPPP under general anesthesia. The other operations to remove the multi block factors were operated in local anesthesia. RESULT: In 198 group one patients, there were 169 patients accepted UPPP in general anesthesia without tracheotomy, the other 29 patients were conducted with tracheotomy. The tracheotomy rate was 14.6%. The total effective cure rate was 85.9%. In all 58 group two patients, tracheotomy were conducted, and the total effective cure rate was 63.8%. The complication rate of all the two groups' patients was 3.5%. After three weeks,the uvulas decurtated from(4.89 +/- 0.58) cm to (3.12 +/- 0.46)cm. CONCLUSION: It is important to divide the severe OSAHS patients into severe group and extra severe group because the treatments were different. Not all the severe OSAHS patients need tracheotomy. There were advantages to retain the uvula in UPPP and patients' life quality was improved with uvula reserved.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the diagnose and treatment of severe OSAHS with distinction of different extent. METHOD: All 256 severe OSAHS patients were divided into two groups according to sleep apnea hypopnea index (AHI): group one (severe group), 40 < AHI < 65; group two (extra severe group), AHI > or = 65. All patients were underwent CPAP treatment for at least one week before modified UPPP in general anesthesia. UPPP and (or) nasal septum plasty or partial inferior turbinectomy were operated in one stage if tracheotomy was conducted. If tracheotomy were not conducted, the patient was only accepted UPPP under general anesthesia. The other operations to remove the multi block factors were operated in local anesthesia. RESULT: In 198 group one patients, there were 169 patients accepted UPPP in general anesthesia without tracheotomy, the other 29 patients were conducted with tracheotomy. The tracheotomy rate was 14.6%. The total effective cure rate was 85.9%. In all 58 group two patients, tracheotomy were conducted, and the total effective cure rate was 63.8%. The complication rate of all the two groups' patients was 3.5%. After three weeks,the uvulas decurtated from(4.89 +/- 0.58) cm to (3.12 +/- 0.46)cm. CONCLUSION: It is important to divide the severe OSAHS patients into severe group and extra severe group because the treatments were different. Not all the severe OSAHS patients need tracheotomy. There were advantages to retain the uvula in UPPP and patients' life quality was improved with uvula reserved.

Key concepts: Tracheotomy, Medicine, Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty, Anesthesia, Surgery, Obstructive sleep apnea, Hypopnea, Sleep apnea

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Diagnose and treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens