2008International Journal of Medical RadiologyRequires access

Comparative study of CT and MRI in diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer

MA Daqin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of MRI and CT in the diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Methods 27 patients with rectal cancer proved surgically and histologically between January to December of 2007 were studied. Each of patients underwent MRI and CT examinations before surgical operation. MRI study included T1WI,T2WI and FSPGR pulse sequences. CT study included plain and contrast enhanced scanning. The size and signal intensity of tumor,surrounding infiltration,and lymph nodes around the rectum were observed. The imaging findings were compared with those from surgery and pathology. Results In the preoperative T staging,the accuracy of CT and MRI were 88.9% and 96.2%,respectively. The specificity of regional lymph node invasion with CT and MRI both were 97.6%; the sensitivity of regional lymph node invasion with CT and MRI were 24% and 36%,respectively. Conclusion MRI was superior to CT in the diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of MRI and CT in the diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Methods 27 patients with rectal cancer proved surgically and histologically between January to December of 2007 were studied. Each of patients underwent MRI and CT examinations before surgical operation. MRI study included T1WI,T2WI and FSPGR pulse sequences. CT study included plain and contrast enhanced scanning. The size and signal intensity of tumor,surrounding infiltration,and lymph nodes around the rectum were observed. The imaging findings were compared with those from surgery and pathology. Results In the preoperative T staging,the accuracy of CT and MRI were 88.9% and 96.2%,respectively. The specificity of regional lymph node invasion with CT and MRI both were 97.6%; the sensitivity of regional lymph node invasion with CT and MRI were 24% and 36%,respectively. Conclusion MRI was superior to CT in the diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of MRI and CT in the diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Methods 27 patients with rectal cancer proved surgically and histologically between January to December of 2007 were studied. Each of patients underwent MRI and CT examinations before surgical operation. MRI study included T1WI,T2WI and FSPGR pulse sequences. CT study included plain and contrast enhanced scanning. The size and signal intensity of tumor,surrounding infiltration,and lymph nodes around the rectum were observed. The imaging findings were compared with those from surgery and pathology. Results In the preoperative T staging,the accuracy of CT and MRI were 88.9% and 96.2%,respectively. The specificity of regional lymph node invasion with CT and MRI both were 97.6%; the sensitivity of regional lymph node invasion with CT and MRI were 24% and 36%,respectively. Conclusion MRI was superior to CT in the diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Key concepts: Medicine, Colorectal cancer, Radiology, Magnetic resonance imaging, Lymph node, Rectum, Preoperative care, Lymph

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of CT and MRI in diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens