2009Geographical ResearchRequires access

The diversification of research approaches in human geography in Chinese Mainland

Tang Mao-lin

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Beginning with the problems facing the Chinese geographical academia from a review paper on the issues of the progress and retrospect in geography in Chinese mainland,the paper reviews the related research results,and guides the readers to the methodological issues of human geography research.Through the retrospect of the development of human geography approaches and philosophies in the Anglophone world,the author comes to a conclusion that the research paradigm and methodology has been diversified since the 1970s.Through the period from the 1970s to the present,geography was in a state of turmoil.Although Chinese human geographers need not dance to the pipe of the Anglophone counterparts,the diversification of approaches in the Anglophone world can be used as a reference point. Just because of the realization of the limitations of positivist paradigm and reaction,structurism(including Marxism),humanism,feminism,and post-modernism(including poststructurism) appeared and exerted much effect on the research methodologies and paradigms of human geography in Anglophone world.During this course of methodological diversification,geography lost its traditional core but now has a strong periphery. China,as a giant transitional developing country,has a complex geographical pattern of human activities.This complexity is attributed not only to its long history and giant internal inequality,physically and economically,but also to the market-based social and economic reforms.The result is that the postmodern issue parallels the modern problem.This situation gives Chinese human geographers an unprecedented opportunity.The related researches by Chinese human geographers are dominated by empiricism,particularly positivism,and the attention that the researchers paid to the human aspects is not enough.So it is badly needed to diversify the research methodology and approach in order to deepen the researches.The paper discusses the necessity,and gives the countermeasures about the diversification of research approaches in human geography in Chinese Mainland,with the aim to do a little bit to the rational development of human geography in China.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Beginning with the problems facing the Chinese geographical academia from a review paper on the issues of the progress and retrospect in geography in Chinese mainland,the paper reviews the related research results,and guides the readers to the methodological issues of human geography research.Through the retrospect of the development of human geography approaches and philosophies in the Anglophone world,the author comes to a conclusion that the research paradigm and methodology has been diversified since the 1970s.Through the period from the 1970s to the present,geography was in a state of turmoil.Although Chinese human geographers need not dance to the pipe of the Anglophone counterparts,the diversification of approaches in the Anglophone world can be used as a reference point. Just because of the realization of the limitations of positivist paradigm and reaction,structurism(including Marxism),humanism,feminism,and post-modernism(including poststructurism) appeared and exerted much effect on the research methodologies and paradigms of human geography in Anglophone world.During this course of methodological diversification,geography lost its traditional core but now has a strong periphery. China,as a giant transitional developing country,has a complex geographical pattern of human activities.This complexity is attributed not only to its long history and giant internal inequality,physically and economically,but also to the market-based social and economic reforms.The result is that the postmodern issue parallels the modern problem.This situation gives Chinese human geographers an unprecedented opportunity.The related researches by Chinese human geographers are dominated by empiricism,particularly positivism,and the attention that the researchers paid to the human aspects is not enough.So it is badly needed to diversify the research methodology and approach in order to deepen the researches.The paper discusses the necessity,and gives the countermeasures about the diversification of research approaches in human geography in Chinese Mainland,with the aim to do a little bit to the rational development of human geography in China.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Beginning with the problems facing the Chinese geographical academia from a review paper on the issues of the progress and retrospect in geography in Chinese mainland,the paper reviews the related research results,and guides the readers to the methodological issues of human geography research.Through the retrospect of the development of human geography approaches and philosophies in the Anglophone world,the author comes to a conclusion that the research paradigm and methodology has been diversified since the 1970s.Through the period from the 1970s to the present,geography was in a state of turmoil.Although Chinese human geographers need not dance to the pipe of the Anglophone counterparts,the diversification of approaches in the Anglophone world can be used as a reference point. Just because of the realization of the limitations of positivist paradigm and reaction,structurism(including Marxism),humanism,feminism,and post-modernism(including poststructurism) appeared and exerted much effect on the research methodologies and paradigms of human geography in Anglophone world.During this course of methodological diversification,geography lost its traditional core but now has a strong periphery. China,as a giant transitional developing country,has a complex geographical pattern of human activities.This complexity is attributed not only to its long history and giant internal inequality,physically and economically,but also to the market-based social and economic reforms.The result is that the postmodern issue parallels the modern problem.This situation gives Chinese human geographers an unprecedented opportunity.The related researches by Chinese human geographers are dominated by empiricism,particularly positivism,and the attention that the researchers paid to the human aspects is not enough.So it is badly needed to diversify the research methodology and approach in order to deepen the researches.The paper discusses the necessity,and gives the countermeasures about the diversification of research approaches in human geography in Chinese Mainland,with the aim to do a little bit to the rational development of human geography in China.

Key concepts: Human geography, Positivism, Mainland China, Social science, Geography, Humanism, Critical geography, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The diversification of research approaches in human geography in Chinese Mainland — Research Paper | ScholarLens