2011Acta Petrologica SinicaRequires access

Isopach maps of the Qixia and Maokou formations:Implication for mantle plume model of the Emeishan large igneous province

Li Hong

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

The thicknesses of Qixia and Maokou formations in the Emeishan Large Igneous Province(ELIP) and peripheral areas were collected and isopach maps were made by Surfer respectively.The isopach maps indicate that uplift caused by Emeishan mantle plume has started in Qixianian.Disconformities were distributed broadly on the top of Maokou Formation,which demonstrate that Maokou Formation has been uplifted over the sea level and denudated differentially.This has been predicated in Campbell and Griffiths's classic mantle plume model.There is a blank area of Permian stratum in Yongren-Dayao-Chuxiong-Shiping and Yiliang-Qujing,which probably was the maximum uplift area.The maximum uplift of ELIP was 1500m induced through laboratory model,which was basically in agreement with the result of sedimentary records.The center of mantle plume implied by differential erosion was consistent with the focus of radiating basic dyke swarms.Hydromagmatic deposits and submarine basaltic extrusions were the result of the rapid subsidence followed the uplift and weren't an important evidence to deny the mantle plume dynamic model of ELIP.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The thicknesses of Qixia and Maokou formations in the Emeishan Large Igneous Province(ELIP) and peripheral areas were collected and isopach maps were made by Surfer respectively.The isopach maps indicate that uplift caused by Emeishan mantle plume has started in Qixianian.Disconformities were distributed broadly on the top of Maokou Formation,which demonstrate that Maokou Formation has been uplifted over the sea level and denudated differentially.This has been predicated in Campbell and Griffiths's classic mantle plume model.There is a blank area of Permian stratum in Yongren-Dayao-Chuxiong-Shiping and Yiliang-Qujing,which probably was the maximum uplift area.The maximum uplift of ELIP was 1500m induced through laboratory model,which was basically in agreement with the result of sedimentary records.The center of mantle plume implied by differential erosion was consistent with the focus of radiating basic dyke swarms.Hydromagmatic deposits and submarine basaltic extrusions were the result of the rapid subsidence followed the uplift and weren't an important evidence to deny the mantle plume dynamic model of ELIP.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The thicknesses of Qixia and Maokou formations in the Emeishan Large Igneous Province(ELIP) and peripheral areas were collected and isopach maps were made by Surfer respectively.The isopach maps indicate that uplift caused by Emeishan mantle plume has started in Qixianian.Disconformities were distributed broadly on the top of Maokou Formation,which demonstrate that Maokou Formation has been uplifted over the sea level and denudated differentially.This has been predicated in Campbell and Griffiths's classic mantle plume model.There is a blank area of Permian stratum in Yongren-Dayao-Chuxiong-Shiping and Yiliang-Qujing,which probably was the maximum uplift area.The maximum uplift of ELIP was 1500m induced through laboratory model,which was basically in agreement with the result of sedimentary records.The center of mantle plume implied by differential erosion was consistent with the focus of radiating basic dyke swarms.Hydromagmatic deposits and submarine basaltic extrusions were the result of the rapid subsidence followed the uplift and weren't an important evidence to deny the mantle plume dynamic model of ELIP.

Key concepts: Isopach map, Geology, Mantle plume, Large igneous province, Mantle (geology), Plume, Escarpment, Basalt

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Isopach maps of the Qixia and Maokou formations:Implication for mantle plume model of the Emeishan large igneous province — Research Paper | ScholarLens