2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Prediction of Defects in Tube Hydroforming Based on Forming Stress Limit

Ping Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Transformation relation between limit strain and limit stress is derived on the basis of the plastic theory and Hill79 yield criterion. Then, the conventional strain-based forming limit diagram (FLD) of 2008T4 Aluminum alloy sheet is converted into stress-based forming limit stress diagram (FLSD). This FLSD is used in conjunction with LS-DYNA finite element simulation to predict the onset of necking and the limit pressure in T-shaped tube hydroforming. The prediction results using FLSD and FLD are also compared. The research indicates that two predicted forming limits are obviously different. Although the necking occurs at the same location in both prediction results, the limit pressures make a great difference. And the limit pressure predicted by FLSD compares well with the experimental result. In view of the strong path-dependence of the FLD, it will be more convenient and reliable to use FLSD criterion in tube hydroforming analysis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Transformation relation between limit strain and limit stress is derived on the basis of the plastic theory and Hill79 yield criterion. Then, the conventional strain-based forming limit diagram (FLD) of 2008T4 Aluminum alloy sheet is converted into stress-based forming limit stress diagram (FLSD). This FLSD is used in conjunction with LS-DYNA finite element simulation to predict the onset of necking and the limit pressure in T-shaped tube hydroforming. The prediction results using FLSD and FLD are also compared. The research indicates that two predicted forming limits are obviously different. Although the necking occurs at the same location in both prediction results, the limit pressures make a great difference. And the limit pressure predicted by FLSD compares well with the experimental result. In view of the strong path-dependence of the FLD, it will be more convenient and reliable to use FLSD criterion in tube hydroforming analysis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Transformation relation between limit strain and limit stress is derived on the basis of the plastic theory and Hill79 yield criterion. Then, the conventional strain-based forming limit diagram (FLD) of 2008T4 Aluminum alloy sheet is converted into stress-based forming limit stress diagram (FLSD). This FLSD is used in conjunction with LS-DYNA finite element simulation to predict the onset of necking and the limit pressure in T-shaped tube hydroforming. The prediction results using FLSD and FLD are also compared. The research indicates that two predicted forming limits are obviously different. Although the necking occurs at the same location in both prediction results, the limit pressures make a great difference. And the limit pressure predicted by FLSD compares well with the experimental result. In view of the strong path-dependence of the FLD, it will be more convenient and reliable to use FLSD criterion in tube hydroforming analysis.

Key concepts: Hydroforming, Necking, Forming limit diagram, Limit (mathematics), Materials science, Stress (linguistics), Tube (container), Finite element method

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prediction of Defects in Tube Hydroforming Based on Forming Stress Limit — Research Paper | ScholarLens