2002Zhonghua xiaohua neijing zazhiRequires access

Study on painless gastroscopy with propofol and midazolam

Wuliang Tang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the efficacy and safety of sedation for gastroscopy with a combined use of propofol and midazolam compared to a control, non-sedative group , with the goal of establishing a method of painless gastroscopy. Methods One thousand nine hundred fifteen patients in sedative group were given intravenous propofol and midazolam . Patients feeling and discomfort, operators satisfaction and operative duration were compared with the control group ( n = 640, without sedation ) . The changes of blood pressure, heart rate and blood oxygen saturation were recorded and analysed. Results One thousand nine hundred patients(99. 2% ) in sedative group and 224 patients(35. 0% ) in control group did not complain any discomfort and pain during gastroscopy(P 0. 01). The incidence of cough, restlessness, nausea and vomiting, and guttural discomfort in sedative group( 1. 1% ,0. 8% ,0. 5% and 0% ,respectively) was lower as compared with the control group(5. 0% .5. 3% ,45. 0% and 37. 5% ,respectively, P 0. 01). The operative duration of sedative group was shorter than that of control group. The recovery time of sedative group was ( 1.4±1. 3 ) minutes. The blood pressure in sedative group was decreased during the procedure and recovered after the procedure. Conclusion With intravenous use of propofol and midazolam , gastroscopy can be performed effectively and safely.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the efficacy and safety of sedation for gastroscopy with a combined use of propofol and midazolam compared to a control, non-sedative group , with the goal of establishing a method of painless gastroscopy. Methods One thousand nine hundred fifteen patients in sedative group were given intravenous propofol and midazolam . Patients feeling and discomfort, operators satisfaction and operative duration were compared with the control group ( n = 640, without sedation ) . The changes of blood pressure, heart rate and blood oxygen saturation were recorded and analysed. Results One thousand nine hundred patients(99. 2% ) in sedative group and 224 patients(35. 0% ) in control group did not complain any discomfort and pain during gastroscopy(P 0. 01). The incidence of cough, restlessness, nausea and vomiting, and guttural discomfort in sedative group( 1. 1% ,0. 8% ,0. 5% and 0% ,respectively) was lower as compared with the control group(5. 0% .5. 3% ,45. 0% and 37. 5% ,respectively, P 0. 01). The operative duration of sedative group was shorter than that of control group. The recovery time of sedative group was ( 1.4±1. 3 ) minutes. The blood pressure in sedative group was decreased during the procedure and recovered after the procedure. Conclusion With intravenous use of propofol and midazolam , gastroscopy can be performed effectively and safely.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the efficacy and safety of sedation for gastroscopy with a combined use of propofol and midazolam compared to a control, non-sedative group , with the goal of establishing a method of painless gastroscopy. Methods One thousand nine hundred fifteen patients in sedative group were given intravenous propofol and midazolam . Patients feeling and discomfort, operators satisfaction and operative duration were compared with the control group ( n = 640, without sedation ) . The changes of blood pressure, heart rate and blood oxygen saturation were recorded and analysed. Results One thousand nine hundred patients(99. 2% ) in sedative group and 224 patients(35. 0% ) in control group did not complain any discomfort and pain during gastroscopy(P 0. 01). The incidence of cough, restlessness, nausea and vomiting, and guttural discomfort in sedative group( 1. 1% ,0. 8% ,0. 5% and 0% ,respectively) was lower as compared with the control group(5. 0% .5. 3% ,45. 0% and 37. 5% ,respectively, P 0. 01). The operative duration of sedative group was shorter than that of control group. The recovery time of sedative group was ( 1.4±1. 3 ) minutes. The blood pressure in sedative group was decreased during the procedure and recovered after the procedure. Conclusion With intravenous use of propofol and midazolam , gastroscopy can be performed effectively and safely.

Key concepts: Medicine, Midazolam, Sedative, Propofol, Sedation, Anesthesia, Vomiting, Nausea

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source