On Argument Evaluation from A Perspective of Informal Logic
Minghui Xiong
Abstract
Minghui Xiong
Abstract
Arguments are normally divided into formal and informal ones.The former is concerned with by formal logic while the latter is focused on by informal logic.In this paper,we first discuss several definitions of logic,analysis the background of the rise of informal logic,study the difference between formal and informal logic,propose three criteria to accessing informal arguments-logical,dialectical,and rhetorical-from informal logic.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Arguments are normally divided into formal and informal ones.The former is concerned with by formal logic while the latter is focused on by informal logic.In this paper,we first discuss several definitions of logic,analysis the background of the rise of informal logic,study the difference between formal and informal logic,propose three criteria to accessing informal arguments-logical,dialectical,and rhetorical-from informal logic.
Key concepts: Informal logic, Philosophy of logic, Argument map, Argument (complex analysis), Rhetorical question, Paraconsistent logic, Epistemology, Dialectic