2015•Xiandai faxueRequires access

The Beneficial Law: The Extremalization of Substantive Justice

Yuan Fa-qian

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations of the People's Republic of China enacted in 2010 requires application of the most beneficial substantive law in some foreign relationships. Though this may be positive to realize the trend of substantive justice of conflict of laws,it also adds obstacle for the court to ascertain and accurately apply foreign law,which is not beneficial for the simplification of judicial tasks. The beneficial law approach is a reproduction of American best law theory which requires judges to compare the different results of foreign substantive laws. We should bear in mind that the trend of substantive justice of conflict of laws should be limited in a scope and not replace the role of substantive law. Otherwise,conflict of laws will lose its stability and predictability and at last lose its value of rule. Considering that it has been enacted not long,the Supreme Court should rectify it by judicial interpretation at present.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations of the People's Republic of China enacted in 2010 requires application of the most beneficial substantive law in some foreign relationships. Though this may be positive to realize the trend of substantive justice of conflict of laws,it also adds obstacle for the court to ascertain and accurately apply foreign law,which is not beneficial for the simplification of judicial tasks. The beneficial law approach is a reproduction of American best law theory which requires judges to compare the different results of foreign substantive laws. We should bear in mind that the trend of substantive justice of conflict of laws should be limited in a scope and not replace the role of substantive law. Otherwise,conflict of laws will lose its stability and predictability and at last lose its value of rule. Considering that it has been enacted not long,the Supreme Court should rectify it by judicial interpretation at present.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations of the People's Republic of China enacted in 2010 requires application of the most beneficial substantive law in some foreign relationships. Though this may be positive to realize the trend of substantive justice of conflict of laws,it also adds obstacle for the court to ascertain and accurately apply foreign law,which is not beneficial for the simplification of judicial tasks. The beneficial law approach is a reproduction of American best law theory which requires judges to compare the different results of foreign substantive laws. We should bear in mind that the trend of substantive justice of conflict of laws should be limited in a scope and not replace the role of substantive law. Otherwise,conflict of laws will lose its stability and predictability and at last lose its value of rule. Considering that it has been enacted not long,the Supreme Court should rectify it by judicial interpretation at present.

Key concepts: Law, Substantive law, Supreme court, Political science, Conflict of laws, Comparative law, Economic Justice, Civil law (Civil law)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Beneficial Law: The Extremalization of Substantive Justice — Research Paper | ScholarLens