Diagnostic value of ECG-gated early post-exercise ~(99m)Tc-MIBI myocardial perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease
Dianfu Li
Abstract
Dianfu Li
Abstract
Objective:To study and compare the diagnostic value of ECG-gated and non ECG-gated early post-exercise stress ~ 99m Tc-MIBI myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in coronary heart disease(CHD).Method:Two hundred and fifteen known or suspected CHD patients who had undergone coronary angiography and ECG-gated MPI within one month in our hospital were enrolled and values of diagnostic sensitivity, specificity were gained and compared among ETT, non ECG-gated MPI and ECG-gated MPI.Result:When angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% is the diagnostic standard of CHD, the sensitivity of ETT, non ECG-gated MPI and G-MPI are 58.0%(94/162),88.3%(143/162),90.7%(147/162) ,respectively;the specificity are 67.9%(36/53),79.2%(42/53),88.7%(47/53) , respectively. ETT, non ECG-gated MPI and ECG-gated MPI have incremental diagnostic value in order with the latter two significantly better than ETT (both P0.01). The specificity of non ECG-gated MPI was better than that of ETT (P0.05), and less than ECG-gated MPI (P0.05), while the specificity of ECG-gated MPI is superior to ETT significantly (P0.01).Conclusion:In CHD diagnoses,ECG-gated MPI is significantly better than ETT,and possibly better than non ECG-gated MPI.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To study and compare the diagnostic value of ECG-gated and non ECG-gated early post-exercise stress ~ 99m Tc-MIBI myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in coronary heart disease(CHD).Method:Two hundred and fifteen known or suspected CHD patients who had undergone coronary angiography and ECG-gated MPI within one month in our hospital were enrolled and values of diagnostic sensitivity, specificity were gained and compared among ETT, non ECG-gated MPI and ECG-gated MPI.Result:When angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% is the diagnostic standard of CHD, the sensitivity of ETT, non ECG-gated MPI and G-MPI are 58.0%(94/162),88.3%(143/162),90.7%(147/162) ,respectively;the specificity are 67.9%(36/53),79.2%(42/53),88.7%(47/53) , respectively. ETT, non ECG-gated MPI and ECG-gated MPI have incremental diagnostic value in order with the latter two significantly better than ETT (both P0.01). The specificity of non ECG-gated MPI was better than that of ETT (P0.05), and less than ECG-gated MPI (P0.05), while the specificity of ECG-gated MPI is superior to ETT significantly (P0.01).Conclusion:In CHD diagnoses,ECG-gated MPI is significantly better than ETT,and possibly better than non ECG-gated MPI.
Key concepts: Myocardial perfusion imaging, Medicine, Coronary artery disease, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Coronary angiography, Radiology, Myocardial infarction