Proper Names and Description——Russell's Criticism to Frege
Xin Yan
Abstract
Xin Yan
Abstract
Proper name and reference are two basic concerns in the philosophy of language. According to Frege, proper names are wide in range and refer to the reality through sense. Differently, Russell distinguishes between proper name and description. The former refers to the reality directly while the latter, which can only be meaningful within context, does not designate a single object directly. He also points out the differences between proper name and ordinary name.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Proper name and reference are two basic concerns in the philosophy of language. According to Frege, proper names are wide in range and refer to the reality through sense. Differently, Russell distinguishes between proper name and description. The former refers to the reality directly while the latter, which can only be meaningful within context, does not designate a single object directly. He also points out the differences between proper name and ordinary name.
Key concepts: Proper noun, Object (grammar), Epistemology, Context (archaeology), Criticism, Philosophy, Linguistics, Computer science