2008Zhongguo xiandai shenjing jibing zazhiRequires access

Comparative analysis of sleep state perception between insomniacs and good sleepers

Chang Da-chua

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To analyse the discrepancy of sleep state perception as well as objective sleep measures between insomniacs and good sleepers, moreover, approach to the traits of sleep state perception in insomniacs. Methods Subjective measures of sleep state perception were obtained from a sleep diary (morning questionnaire) and objective measures from polysomnography (PSG). Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to evaluate the severity of insomnia and preliminary related status. Results Both subjective parameters of sleep state perception and objective measures were significantly different between the insomniacs and controls (P 0.01, for all). Prolonged sleep latency, increased wakefulness time after sleep onset, lower sleep efficiency and decreased total sleep duration were found in insomnia group. The difference of sleep state evaluation similarly existed in both insomnia group and control group (P 0.05, for all), but more prominent in insomniacs (P 0.05), which overestimated their sleep latency particularly. The misperception from sleep state was bilateral in insomniacs. The scores of SAS as well as SDS in insomnia group exceeded control group (P 0.01), and kept a positive correlation with ISI (P 0.01). Especially, the scores of SAS correlated with subjective sleep latency (P 0.01). Conclusion Insomniacs were poor in sleep quality. They had a similar misperception in sleep state compared with good sleepers, but more incongruity between subjective parameters and objective items. Sleep state misperception in insomniacs included bilateral aspect, underestimated their actual sleep state (exaggerated their sleep disorder) or overestimated them (ignored nocturnal sleep deficiency). With correlation test, anxiety as a factor, may directly relate to subjective sleep latency misperception.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To analyse the discrepancy of sleep state perception as well as objective sleep measures between insomniacs and good sleepers, moreover, approach to the traits of sleep state perception in insomniacs. Methods Subjective measures of sleep state perception were obtained from a sleep diary (morning questionnaire) and objective measures from polysomnography (PSG). Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to evaluate the severity of insomnia and preliminary related status. Results Both subjective parameters of sleep state perception and objective measures were significantly different between the insomniacs and controls (P 0.01, for all). Prolonged sleep latency, increased wakefulness time after sleep onset, lower sleep efficiency and decreased total sleep duration were found in insomnia group. The difference of sleep state evaluation similarly existed in both insomnia group and control group (P 0.05, for all), but more prominent in insomniacs (P 0.05), which overestimated their sleep latency particularly. The misperception from sleep state was bilateral in insomniacs. The scores of SAS as well as SDS in insomnia group exceeded control group (P 0.01), and kept a positive correlation with ISI (P 0.01). Especially, the scores of SAS correlated with subjective sleep latency (P 0.01). Conclusion Insomniacs were poor in sleep quality. They had a similar misperception in sleep state compared with good sleepers, but more incongruity between subjective parameters and objective items. Sleep state misperception in insomniacs included bilateral aspect, underestimated their actual sleep state (exaggerated their sleep disorder) or overestimated them (ignored nocturnal sleep deficiency). With correlation test, anxiety as a factor, may directly relate to subjective sleep latency misperception.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To analyse the discrepancy of sleep state perception as well as objective sleep measures between insomniacs and good sleepers, moreover, approach to the traits of sleep state perception in insomniacs. Methods Subjective measures of sleep state perception were obtained from a sleep diary (morning questionnaire) and objective measures from polysomnography (PSG). Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to evaluate the severity of insomnia and preliminary related status. Results Both subjective parameters of sleep state perception and objective measures were significantly different between the insomniacs and controls (P 0.01, for all). Prolonged sleep latency, increased wakefulness time after sleep onset, lower sleep efficiency and decreased total sleep duration were found in insomnia group. The difference of sleep state evaluation similarly existed in both insomnia group and control group (P 0.05, for all), but more prominent in insomniacs (P 0.05), which overestimated their sleep latency particularly. The misperception from sleep state was bilateral in insomniacs. The scores of SAS as well as SDS in insomnia group exceeded control group (P 0.01), and kept a positive correlation with ISI (P 0.01). Especially, the scores of SAS correlated with subjective sleep latency (P 0.01). Conclusion Insomniacs were poor in sleep quality. They had a similar misperception in sleep state compared with good sleepers, but more incongruity between subjective parameters and objective items. Sleep state misperception in insomniacs included bilateral aspect, underestimated their actual sleep state (exaggerated their sleep disorder) or overestimated them (ignored nocturnal sleep deficiency). With correlation test, anxiety as a factor, may directly relate to subjective sleep latency misperception.

Key concepts: Insomnia, Polysomnography, Sleep (system call), Sleep onset latency, Sleep onset, Audiology, Anxiety, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative analysis of sleep state perception between insomniacs and good sleepers — Research Paper | ScholarLens