2012Zhongguo xunhuan zazhiRequires access

Comparison of Single Imaging and Fusion Imaging Technique for Assessing Myocardial Perfusion in Patients of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Coronary Artery Lesions

Ding Jia

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the effect of single myocardial perfusion imaging(MPI) and MPI combined with coronary CT angiography(CCTA) on coronary artery lesion diagnosis in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus(DM) with coronary artery lesions. Methods:A total of 85 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease(CAD) or suspected CAD were examined by adenosine stress/rest MPI and coronary angiography(CAG) within one month,38 of them underwent CCTA with the same SPECT/CT facility.MPI was evaluated by semi quantitative visual interpretation using a 17-segment model.According to CAG and CCTA stan-dard,the coronary condition was defined as normal,mild,intermediate and severe lesions.CAG and CAG/ MPI combination were used to evaluate the effect of coronary lesion diagnosis for MPI and MPI/CCTA fusion imaging.Results:In 85 patients,MPI presented normal/abnormal was 22/63.MPI diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive and negative prediction rate for coronary lesions were 80.19%,88.59%,85.10%,83.33% and 86.27% respectively;it showed 20(24%) mild lesion cases,12(14%) intermediate lesion cases and 31(36%) severe lesion cases.For 38 patients who underwent CCTA,the diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive and negative prediction rate by MPI vs.MPI/CCTA were 74.55% vs.96.97%,81.36% vs.91.67%,78.07% vs.94.74%,78.85% vs.94.12% and 77.42% vs.95.65% respectively.MPI/CCTA fusion imaging presented normal 40.35%(46 segment /114 branch),intermediate or more stenosis 59.65%(68 segment /114 branch).Conclusion:MPI/CCTA fusion imaging has been superior to MPI alone for early CAD diagnosis in DM patients with coronary artery lesions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the effect of single myocardial perfusion imaging(MPI) and MPI combined with coronary CT angiography(CCTA) on coronary artery lesion diagnosis in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus(DM) with coronary artery lesions. Methods:A total of 85 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease(CAD) or suspected CAD were examined by adenosine stress/rest MPI and coronary angiography(CAG) within one month,38 of them underwent CCTA with the same SPECT/CT facility.MPI was evaluated by semi quantitative visual interpretation using a 17-segment model.According to CAG and CCTA stan-dard,the coronary condition was defined as normal,mild,intermediate and severe lesions.CAG and CAG/ MPI combination were used to evaluate the effect of coronary lesion diagnosis for MPI and MPI/CCTA fusion imaging.Results:In 85 patients,MPI presented normal/abnormal was 22/63.MPI diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive and negative prediction rate for coronary lesions were 80.19%,88.59%,85.10%,83.33% and 86.27% respectively;it showed 20(24%) mild lesion cases,12(14%) intermediate lesion cases and 31(36%) severe lesion cases.For 38 patients who underwent CCTA,the diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive and negative prediction rate by MPI vs.MPI/CCTA were 74.55% vs.96.97%,81.36% vs.91.67%,78.07% vs.94.74%,78.85% vs.94.12% and 77.42% vs.95.65% respectively.MPI/CCTA fusion imaging presented normal 40.35%(46 segment /114 branch),intermediate or more stenosis 59.65%(68 segment /114 branch).Conclusion:MPI/CCTA fusion imaging has been superior to MPI alone for early CAD diagnosis in DM patients with coronary artery lesions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the effect of single myocardial perfusion imaging(MPI) and MPI combined with coronary CT angiography(CCTA) on coronary artery lesion diagnosis in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus(DM) with coronary artery lesions. Methods:A total of 85 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease(CAD) or suspected CAD were examined by adenosine stress/rest MPI and coronary angiography(CAG) within one month,38 of them underwent CCTA with the same SPECT/CT facility.MPI was evaluated by semi quantitative visual interpretation using a 17-segment model.According to CAG and CCTA stan-dard,the coronary condition was defined as normal,mild,intermediate and severe lesions.CAG and CAG/ MPI combination were used to evaluate the effect of coronary lesion diagnosis for MPI and MPI/CCTA fusion imaging.Results:In 85 patients,MPI presented normal/abnormal was 22/63.MPI diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive and negative prediction rate for coronary lesions were 80.19%,88.59%,85.10%,83.33% and 86.27% respectively;it showed 20(24%) mild lesion cases,12(14%) intermediate lesion cases and 31(36%) severe lesion cases.For 38 patients who underwent CCTA,the diagnostic sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive and negative prediction rate by MPI vs.MPI/CCTA were 74.55% vs.96.97%,81.36% vs.91.67%,78.07% vs.94.74%,78.85% vs.94.12% and 77.42% vs.95.65% respectively.MPI/CCTA fusion imaging presented normal 40.35%(46 segment /114 branch),intermediate or more stenosis 59.65%(68 segment /114 branch).Conclusion:MPI/CCTA fusion imaging has been superior to MPI alone for early CAD diagnosis in DM patients with coronary artery lesions.

Key concepts: Medicine, Myocardial perfusion imaging, Coronary artery disease, Lesion, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Perfusion, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Single Imaging and Fusion Imaging Technique for Assessing Myocardial Perfusion in Patients of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Coronary Artery Lesions — Research Paper | ScholarLens