2000Seismological Research of Northeast ChinaRequires access

DISCUSSION ON TWO MAGNITUDE SCALES

Chi Zhen-cai

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The main problems of two magnitude scales are emphasized in this paper. Many questions in the work of determined ML and Ms are analysed and discussed. The local earthquake magnitude calculated by the calibration function system currently in effect shows a systematic deviation along with the epicenter distances. This function system is not suitable for the seismograph instrument of DD1.A large amount of data indicate that the surface-wave magnitude values determined by the Beijing formula tend to be higher than those reported by the main international seismological organizations . This formula is zero magnitude out of control on the distance 90(. It is a fundamental conception wrong that MS is calculated by the single horizontal component record. In view of the above-mentioned facts, it is necessary to establish a new calibration function system to determine ML and a new formula to determine MS.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The main problems of two magnitude scales are emphasized in this paper. Many questions in the work of determined ML and Ms are analysed and discussed. The local earthquake magnitude calculated by the calibration function system currently in effect shows a systematic deviation along with the epicenter distances. This function system is not suitable for the seismograph instrument of DD1.A large amount of data indicate that the surface-wave magnitude values determined by the Beijing formula tend to be higher than those reported by the main international seismological organizations . This formula is zero magnitude out of control on the distance 90(. It is a fundamental conception wrong that MS is calculated by the single horizontal component record. In view of the above-mentioned facts, it is necessary to establish a new calibration function system to determine ML and a new formula to determine MS.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The main problems of two magnitude scales are emphasized in this paper. Many questions in the work of determined ML and Ms are analysed and discussed. The local earthquake magnitude calculated by the calibration function system currently in effect shows a systematic deviation along with the epicenter distances. This function system is not suitable for the seismograph instrument of DD1.A large amount of data indicate that the surface-wave magnitude values determined by the Beijing formula tend to be higher than those reported by the main international seismological organizations . This formula is zero magnitude out of control on the distance 90(. It is a fundamental conception wrong that MS is calculated by the single horizontal component record. In view of the above-mentioned facts, it is necessary to establish a new calibration function system to determine ML and a new formula to determine MS.

Key concepts: Magnitude (astronomy), Seismometer, Epicenter, Calibration, Richter magnitude scale, Function (biology), Geodesy, Standard deviation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DISCUSSION ON TWO MAGNITUDE SCALES — Research Paper | ScholarLens