Tone-based Rhythm of Chinese and Stress-based Rhythm of English
XU Xi-min
Abstract
XU Xi-min
Abstract
In line with Hyman's theory of phonological typology,Chinese could be categorized as tone-based rhythm manifested in monosyllabic and disyllabic words and even discourse structure,while English could be categorized as stress-based rhythm reflected in the alternation of stressed and unstressed syllables. It is argued that Chinese accent,rather than stress,is realized through the use of tone,and lacks lexical markers. Both rhythmic properties perform grammatical and semantic functions so as to be perceived and recognized by Chinese and English natives respectively.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In line with Hyman's theory of phonological typology,Chinese could be categorized as tone-based rhythm manifested in monosyllabic and disyllabic words and even discourse structure,while English could be categorized as stress-based rhythm reflected in the alternation of stressed and unstressed syllables. It is argued that Chinese accent,rather than stress,is realized through the use of tone,and lacks lexical markers. Both rhythmic properties perform grammatical and semantic functions so as to be perceived and recognized by Chinese and English natives respectively.
Key concepts: Rhythm, Tone (literature), Linguistics, Stress (linguistics), Stress (linguistics), Alternation (linguistics), Psychology, Typology