The International Criminal Court and national jurisdictions in light of the principle of complementarity
Juan Jorge Piernas López
Abstract
Juan Jorge Piernas López
Abstract
This article aims to analyze the practice of the Office of the Prosecutor and of the judicial organs of the International Criminal Court in relation to the principle of complementarity established by the Rome Statute. To that end, the article examines the fundamental elements of the complementarity principle and its practical application in four situations currently examined by the Prosecutor of the Court, namely, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Libya and Colombia.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article aims to analyze the practice of the Office of the Prosecutor and of the judicial organs of the International Criminal Court in relation to the principle of complementarity established by the Rome Statute. To that end, the article examines the fundamental elements of the complementarity principle and its practical application in four situations currently examined by the Prosecutor of the Court, namely, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Libya and Colombia.
Key concepts: Complementarity (molecular biology), Criminal court, Statute, Democracy, Constitutional court, Political science, Law, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court