2003Journal of Heze Teachers CollegeRequires access

Comparing Several Testing Methods of Heteroscedasticity

Gong Xiu-fang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

One of the important hypotheses of classical linear regression model is that the random disturbances have equal variance. However, in most economic phenomena, the disturbances vary with the observations. The model which has such kind of property is referred to as heteroscedastic regression model. If it is estimated by the method of OLS, it will bring about serious effects. Thus, it is of great significance to choose the proper testing methods of heteroscedasticity. In this article three different forms of heteroscedasticity are used in the random simulation, and then the Park test, the Glejser test and the Goldfeld-Quandt test are compared .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One of the important hypotheses of classical linear regression model is that the random disturbances have equal variance. However, in most economic phenomena, the disturbances vary with the observations. The model which has such kind of property is referred to as heteroscedastic regression model. If it is estimated by the method of OLS, it will bring about serious effects. Thus, it is of great significance to choose the proper testing methods of heteroscedasticity. In this article three different forms of heteroscedasticity are used in the random simulation, and then the Park test, the Glejser test and the Goldfeld-Quandt test are compared .

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One of the important hypotheses of classical linear regression model is that the random disturbances have equal variance. However, in most economic phenomena, the disturbances vary with the observations. The model which has such kind of property is referred to as heteroscedastic regression model. If it is estimated by the method of OLS, it will bring about serious effects. Thus, it is of great significance to choose the proper testing methods of heteroscedasticity. In this article three different forms of heteroscedasticity are used in the random simulation, and then the Park test, the Glejser test and the Goldfeld-Quandt test are compared .

Key concepts: Heteroscedasticity, Econometrics, Variance (accounting), Linear regression, Test (biology), Statistics, Regression analysis, Homoscedasticity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparing Several Testing Methods of Heteroscedasticity — Research Paper | ScholarLens