2011Chinese Journal of Aesthetic MedicineRequires access

Comparison of palatal movement of maxillary second molar with two methods

Xin Yan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate characters of micro-implant anchorage and intraoral anchorage during maxillary second molars mesialization in Class I malocclusal patients.Methods 24 patients were divided into two groups equally.Measuring movement speed and position changes of maxillary second molars from buccopalata and vertical position.Results In implant anchorage group:the velocity of maxillary second molar was 0.86 mm per month,palatal movement 3.8mm,intrusive movement 0.45mm.In intraoral anchorage group: the velocity of maxillary second molar was 0.65 mm per month,palatal movement 4.0 mm,extrusive movement 1.86 mm.Conclusion Two methods successfully palatalize maxillary molars to appropriate positions.But implant anchorage is stronger and faster than another.Then move mode of maxillary molar differenciate from each other.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate characters of micro-implant anchorage and intraoral anchorage during maxillary second molars mesialization in Class I malocclusal patients.Methods 24 patients were divided into two groups equally.Measuring movement speed and position changes of maxillary second molars from buccopalata and vertical position.Results In implant anchorage group:the velocity of maxillary second molar was 0.86 mm per month,palatal movement 3.8mm,intrusive movement 0.45mm.In intraoral anchorage group: the velocity of maxillary second molar was 0.65 mm per month,palatal movement 4.0 mm,extrusive movement 1.86 mm.Conclusion Two methods successfully palatalize maxillary molars to appropriate positions.But implant anchorage is stronger and faster than another.Then move mode of maxillary molar differenciate from each other.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate characters of micro-implant anchorage and intraoral anchorage during maxillary second molars mesialization in Class I malocclusal patients.Methods 24 patients were divided into two groups equally.Measuring movement speed and position changes of maxillary second molars from buccopalata and vertical position.Results In implant anchorage group:the velocity of maxillary second molar was 0.86 mm per month,palatal movement 3.8mm,intrusive movement 0.45mm.In intraoral anchorage group: the velocity of maxillary second molar was 0.65 mm per month,palatal movement 4.0 mm,extrusive movement 1.86 mm.Conclusion Two methods successfully palatalize maxillary molars to appropriate positions.But implant anchorage is stronger and faster than another.Then move mode of maxillary molar differenciate from each other.

Key concepts: Molar, Extrusive, Orthodontics, Maxillary molar, Dentistry, Maxillary first molar, Medicine, Implant

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of palatal movement of maxillary second molar with two methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens