2016Obstetrics and GynecologyRequires access

What Does an Endometrial Biopsy Result Suggestive of an Endometrial Polyp Mean? [6J]

Angel Rafael Gonzalez Rios, Melissa T. Chu Lam, Aaron Herrera Gonzalez, James N. Anasti

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endometrial polyps (EMPolyp) are a common cause of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). For over 30 years endometrial biopsy (EMB) has been an important tool in the work up of AUB. Occasionally the pathologic sample obtained from an EMB may note a “possible” EMPolyp. However, hysteroscopy is considered the “gold standard” for diagnosis of EMPolyps. Our study attempts to look at existence of an EMPolyp when suggested by EMB. METHODS: We reviewed all EMBs send to our pathology lab during the last full year (2014). All EMBs read as “endometrial polyp” or “suggestive of endometrial polyp” were analyzed. Demographic data and medical histories were obtained on these patients. Pre-EMB ultrasounds (US) and post EMB hysteroscopy operative notes, if available, were reviewed. RESULTS: An EMB suggestive for polyps was noted in 102 of 1,380 (7.4%) procedures done for AUB. The mean age was 47.3±10.5 years and BMI 30.6±8.7 kg/m2. Diabetes was noted in 14/102 (13.7%) and hypertension in 36/102 (35.3%). In the 32 patients that underwent follow-up hysteroscopy, polyps were noted in 24. Thus EMB correctly identify the polyps in 75% of cases. Of the 23 Pre-biopsy US all but one correctly predicted the presence or absence of EMPolyp. CONCLUSION: An EMB finding suggestive of EMPolyp appears to overcall their existence. Even non-saline infusion sonography appears to be a better predicator than EMB in diagnosing the presence or absence of an EMPolyp.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: Endometrial polyps (EMPolyp) are a common cause of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). For over 30 years endometrial biopsy (EMB) has been an important tool in the work up of AUB. Occasionally the pathologic sample obtained from an EMB may note a “possible” EMPolyp. However, hysteroscopy is considered the “gold standard” for diagnosis of EMPolyps. Our study attempts to look at existence of an EMPolyp when suggested by EMB. METHODS: We reviewed all EMBs send to our pathology lab during the last full year (2014). All EMBs read as “endometrial polyp” or “suggestive of endometrial polyp” were analyzed. Demographic data and medical histories were obtained on these patients. Pre-EMB ultrasounds (US) and post EMB hysteroscopy operative notes, if available, were reviewed. RESULTS: An EMB suggestive for polyps was noted in 102 of 1,380 (7.4%) procedures done for AUB. The mean age was 47.3±10.5 years and BMI 30.6±8.7 kg/m2. Diabetes was noted in 14/102 (13.7%) and hypertension in 36/102 (35.3%). In the 32 patients that underwent follow-up hysteroscopy, polyps were noted in 24. Thus EMB correctly identify the polyps in 75% of cases. Of the 23 Pre-biopsy US all but one correctly predicted the presence or absence of EMPolyp. CONCLUSION: An EMB finding suggestive of EMPolyp appears to overcall their existence. Even non-saline infusion sonography appears to be a better predicator than EMB in diagnosing the presence or absence of an EMPolyp.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endometrial polyps (EMPolyp) are a common cause of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). For over 30 years endometrial biopsy (EMB) has been an important tool in the work up of AUB. Occasionally the pathologic sample obtained from an EMB may note a “possible” EMPolyp. However, hysteroscopy is considered the “gold standard” for diagnosis of EMPolyps. Our study attempts to look at existence of an EMPolyp when suggested by EMB. METHODS: We reviewed all EMBs send to our pathology lab during the last full year (2014). All EMBs read as “endometrial polyp” or “suggestive of endometrial polyp” were analyzed. Demographic data and medical histories were obtained on these patients. Pre-EMB ultrasounds (US) and post EMB hysteroscopy operative notes, if available, were reviewed. RESULTS: An EMB suggestive for polyps was noted in 102 of 1,380 (7.4%) procedures done for AUB. The mean age was 47.3±10.5 years and BMI 30.6±8.7 kg/m2. Diabetes was noted in 14/102 (13.7%) and hypertension in 36/102 (35.3%). In the 32 patients that underwent follow-up hysteroscopy, polyps were noted in 24. Thus EMB correctly identify the polyps in 75% of cases. Of the 23 Pre-biopsy US all but one correctly predicted the presence or absence of EMPolyp. CONCLUSION: An EMB finding suggestive of EMPolyp appears to overcall their existence. Even non-saline infusion sonography appears to be a better predicator than EMB in diagnosing the presence or absence of an EMPolyp.

Key concepts: Medicine, Endometrial Polyp, Hysteroscopy, Endometrial biopsy, Biopsy, Gold standard (test), Gynecology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What Does an Endometrial Biopsy Result Suggestive of an Endometrial Polyp Mean? [6J] — Research Paper | ScholarLens