2001Zhonghua mazuixue zazhiRequires access

The pharmacodynamics and serum concentration of tramadol during continuous intravenous infusion for postoperative analgesia

Huifang Xu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To examine pharmacodynamics and serum concentration of tramadol during continuous intravenous infusion for postoperative pain relief Methods 500 ASA Ⅰ Ⅱ patients undergoing operation on extremities, spine or abdomen under anesthesia were studied Premedication included phenobarbital 0 1g and atropine 0 5mg im Anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0 08 0 12mg·kg -1 , fentanyl 5 6μg·kg -1 and vecuronium 0 12 0 14 mg·kg -1 and maintained with continuous intravenous infusion of propofol 3 0 4 5 mg·kg -1 ·h -1 , fentanyl 2 8 3 4μg·kg -1 ·h -1 and vecuronium 0 06 0 08 mg·kg -1 ·h -1 supplemented with inhalation of 0 8% 1 0% isoflurane At the end of operation a loading dose of tramadol 1 5 mg·kg -1 was given intravenously over 2 min, followed by continuous intravenous infusion of tramadol for 72h The patients were divided into two groups: group Ⅰ (n=246) received tramadol intravenous infusion at a rate of 8mg h -1 and group Ⅱ (n=254) received tramadol infusion at a rate of 10mg h -1 Venous blood samples were taken from 10 patients in group Ⅱ at 0, 0 5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 30, 42, 48, 54, 60, 72h during postoperative tramadol infusion for determination of serum concentration of tramadol by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) Efficacy of analgesia was assessed by VAS score and side effects were recorded Results The two groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, weight, types of operation and the amount of fentanyl used during operation There was significant difference in the mean VAS scores between group Ⅰ (1 16±1 15) and group Ⅱ (0 83±1 33) (P0 01) The overall satisfaction rate was 84 15% in group Ⅰand 91 33% in group Ⅱ(P0 01) However there was no significant difference in side effects such as nausea, vomiting and drowsiness between the two groups except the occurrence of urine retention which was more frequent in group Ⅱ (10 6%) than in group Ⅰ (6 25%) The mean serum concentration of tramadol during tramadol iv infusion at a rate of 10 mg·h -1 was (0 521±0 216)μg·ml -1 Couclusions Continuous intravenous infusion of tramadol 10 mg·h -1 can provide satisfactory postoperative pain relief with fewer side effects The therapeutic serum concentration of tramadol for postoperative analgesia is about 500ng·ml -1

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To examine pharmacodynamics and serum concentration of tramadol during continuous intravenous infusion for postoperative pain relief Methods 500 ASA Ⅰ Ⅱ patients undergoing operation on extremities, spine or abdomen under anesthesia were studied Premedication included phenobarbital 0 1g and atropine 0 5mg im Anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0 08 0 12mg·kg -1 , fentanyl 5 6μg·kg -1 and vecuronium 0 12 0 14 mg·kg -1 and maintained with continuous intravenous infusion of propofol 3 0 4 5 mg·kg -1 ·h -1 , fentanyl 2 8 3 4μg·kg -1 ·h -1 and vecuronium 0 06 0 08 mg·kg -1 ·h -1 supplemented with inhalation of 0 8% 1 0% isoflurane At the end of operation a loading dose of tramadol 1 5 mg·kg -1 was given intravenously over 2 min, followed by continuous intravenous infusion of tramadol for 72h The patients were divided into two groups: group Ⅰ (n=246) received tramadol intravenous infusion at a rate of 8mg h -1 and group Ⅱ (n=254) received tramadol infusion at a rate of 10mg h -1 Venous blood samples were taken from 10 patients in group Ⅱ at 0, 0 5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 30, 42, 48, 54, 60, 72h during postoperative tramadol infusion for determination of serum concentration of tramadol by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) Efficacy of analgesia was assessed by VAS score and side effects were recorded Results The two groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, weight, types of operation and the amount of fentanyl used during operation There was significant difference in the mean VAS scores between group Ⅰ (1 16±1 15) and group Ⅱ (0 83±1 33) (P0 01) The overall satisfaction rate was 84 15% in group Ⅰand 91 33% in group Ⅱ(P0 01) However there was no significant difference in side effects such as nausea, vomiting and drowsiness between the two groups except the occurrence of urine retention which was more frequent in group Ⅱ (10 6%) than in group Ⅰ (6 25%) The mean serum concentration of tramadol during tramadol iv infusion at a rate of 10 mg·h -1 was (0 521±0 216)μg·ml -1 Couclusions Continuous intravenous infusion of tramadol 10 mg·h -1 can provide satisfactory postoperative pain relief with fewer side effects The therapeutic serum concentration of tramadol for postoperative analgesia is about 500ng·ml -1

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To examine pharmacodynamics and serum concentration of tramadol during continuous intravenous infusion for postoperative pain relief Methods 500 ASA Ⅰ Ⅱ patients undergoing operation on extremities, spine or abdomen under anesthesia were studied Premedication included phenobarbital 0 1g and atropine 0 5mg im Anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0 08 0 12mg·kg -1 , fentanyl 5 6μg·kg -1 and vecuronium 0 12 0 14 mg·kg -1 and maintained with continuous intravenous infusion of propofol 3 0 4 5 mg·kg -1 ·h -1 , fentanyl 2 8 3 4μg·kg -1 ·h -1 and vecuronium 0 06 0 08 mg·kg -1 ·h -1 supplemented with inhalation of 0 8% 1 0% isoflurane At the end of operation a loading dose of tramadol 1 5 mg·kg -1 was given intravenously over 2 min, followed by continuous intravenous infusion of tramadol for 72h The patients were divided into two groups: group Ⅰ (n=246) received tramadol intravenous infusion at a rate of 8mg h -1 and group Ⅱ (n=254) received tramadol infusion at a rate of 10mg h -1 Venous blood samples were taken from 10 patients in group Ⅱ at 0, 0 5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 30, 42, 48, 54, 60, 72h during postoperative tramadol infusion for determination of serum concentration of tramadol by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) Efficacy of analgesia was assessed by VAS score and side effects were recorded Results The two groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, weight, types of operation and the amount of fentanyl used during operation There was significant difference in the mean VAS scores between group Ⅰ (1 16±1 15) and group Ⅱ (0 83±1 33) (P0 01) The overall satisfaction rate was 84 15% in group Ⅰand 91 33% in group Ⅱ(P0 01) However there was no significant difference in side effects such as nausea, vomiting and drowsiness between the two groups except the occurrence of urine retention which was more frequent in group Ⅱ (10 6%) than in group Ⅰ (6 25%) The mean serum concentration of tramadol during tramadol iv infusion at a rate of 10 mg·h -1 was (0 521±0 216)μg·ml -1 Couclusions Continuous intravenous infusion of tramadol 10 mg·h -1 can provide satisfactory postoperative pain relief with fewer side effects The therapeutic serum concentration of tramadol for postoperative analgesia is about 500ng·ml -1

Key concepts: Tramadol, Medicine, Anesthesia, Midazolam, Fentanyl, Propofol, Premedication, Isoflurane

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The pharmacodynamics and serum concentration of tramadol during continuous intravenous infusion for postoperative analgesia — Research Paper | ScholarLens