2015Turkish NeurosurgeryOpen access

Comparison of vertebroplasty versus vertebral perforation for the treatment of acute vertebral compression fractures

Kunio Yokoyama, Masahiro Kawanishi, Makoto Yamada, Hidekazu Tanaka, Yutaka Ito, Shinji Kawabata, Toshihiko Kuroiwa

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

of vertebroplasty, a possible placebo effect of vertebroplasty could not be ruled out (6,11,16,20,21).Firanescu et al. are conducting a randomized controlled trial targeting patients with acute VCFs to compare vertebroplasty and a sham procedure without cement injection, and their trial has not yet reached a conclusion (12).Vertebral perforation for VCFs is a procedure in which an affected vertebral body is perforated but not injected with bone cement (26,27).This procedure is contrived based on a hypothesis that fracture pain is caused by hyper-intraosseous pressure, and the aim of the procedure is to relieve pain by AIM: The efficacy of vertebroplasty on acute vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) has not yet been established.This study, focusing on patients with acute VCFs, aims to compare therapeutic effects between vertebroplasty and vertebral perforation without cement injection. MATERIAL and METHODS:Fifty-five patients with single painful VCFs were assigned to undergo vertebroplasty (Vertebroplasty group; 28 patients) or vertebral perforation (Perforation group; 27 patients).Analgesic effects before and after surgery were compared between 2 groups.Furthermore, the frequency of new VCFs during the follow-up period was compared. RESULTS:In both groups, the visual analog scale (VAS) scores markedly decreased immediately after surgery and remained low until 90 days after surgery (p<0.05).However, in the Perforation group, the analgesic effect from postoperative day 7 to 90 was significantly lower in patients with vertebral mobility before surgery than those without mobility (p<0.05).New fractures after surgery occurred in 12 (42.9%) of the 28 patients in the Vertebroplasty group and 8 (29.6%) of the 27 patients in the Perforation group (p =0.054). CONCLUSION:In acute VCFs, vertebroplasty exerts a marked analgesic effect, which does not differ much from that of vertebral perforation without cement injection.Considering the risk of new postoperative fractures, the application of bone cement infusion should be carefully considered in patients with acute VCF.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

of vertebroplasty, a possible placebo effect of vertebroplasty could not be ruled out (6,11,16,20,21).Firanescu et al. are conducting a randomized controlled trial targeting patients with acute VCFs to compare vertebroplasty and a sham procedure without cement injection, and their trial has not yet reached a conclusion (12).Vertebral perforation for VCFs is a procedure in which an affected vertebral body is perforated but not injected with bone cement (26,27).This procedure is contrived based on a hypothesis that fracture pain is caused by hyper-intraosseous pressure, and the aim of the procedure is to relieve pain by AIM: The efficacy of vertebroplasty on acute vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) has not yet been established.This study, focusing on patients with acute VCFs, aims to compare therapeutic effects between vertebroplasty and vertebral perforation without cement injection. MATERIAL and METHODS:Fifty-five patients with single painful VCFs were assigned to undergo vertebroplasty (Vertebroplasty group; 28 patients) or vertebral perforation (Perforation group; 27 patients).Analgesic effects before and after surgery were compared between 2 groups.Furthermore, the frequency of new VCFs during the follow-up period was compared. RESULTS:In both groups, the visual analog scale (VAS) scores markedly decreased immediately after surgery and remained low until 90 days after surgery (p<0.05).However, in the Perforation group, the analgesic effect from postoperative day 7 to 90 was significantly lower in patients with vertebral mobility before surgery than those without mobility (p<0.05).New fractures after surgery occurred in 12 (42.9%) of the 28 patients in the Vertebroplasty group and 8 (29.6%) of the 27 patients in the Perforation group (p =0.054). CONCLUSION:In acute VCFs, vertebroplasty exerts a marked analgesic effect, which does not differ much from that of vertebral perforation without cement injection.Considering the risk of new postoperative fractures, the application of bone cement infusion should be carefully considered in patients with acute VCF.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

of vertebroplasty, a possible placebo effect of vertebroplasty could not be ruled out (6,11,16,20,21).Firanescu et al. are conducting a randomized controlled trial targeting patients with acute VCFs to compare vertebroplasty and a sham procedure without cement injection, and their trial has not yet reached a conclusion (12).Vertebral perforation for VCFs is a procedure in which an affected vertebral body is perforated but not injected with bone cement (26,27).This procedure is contrived based on a hypothesis that fracture pain is caused by hyper-intraosseous pressure, and the aim of the procedure is to relieve pain by AIM: The efficacy of vertebroplasty on acute vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) has not yet been established.This study, focusing on patients with acute VCFs, aims to compare therapeutic effects between vertebroplasty and vertebral perforation without cement injection. MATERIAL and METHODS:Fifty-five patients with single painful VCFs were assigned to undergo vertebroplasty (Vertebroplasty group; 28 patients) or vertebral perforation (Perforation group; 27 patients).Analgesic effects before and after surgery were compared between 2 groups.Furthermore, the frequency of new VCFs during the follow-up period was compared. RESULTS:In both groups, the visual analog scale (VAS) scores markedly decreased immediately after surgery and remained low until 90 days after surgery (p<0.05).However, in the Perforation group, the analgesic effect from postoperative day 7 to 90 was significantly lower in patients with vertebral mobility before surgery than those without mobility (p<0.05).New fractures after surgery occurred in 12 (42.9%) of the 28 patients in the Vertebroplasty group and 8 (29.6%) of the 27 patients in the Perforation group (p =0.054). CONCLUSION:In acute VCFs, vertebroplasty exerts a marked analgesic effect, which does not differ much from that of vertebral perforation without cement injection.Considering the risk of new postoperative fractures, the application of bone cement infusion should be carefully considered in patients with acute VCF.

Key concepts: Medicine, Perforation, Surgery, Analgesic, Compression (physics), Vertebral compression fracture, Visual analogue scale, Bone cement

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of vertebroplasty versus vertebral perforation for the treatment of acute vertebral compression fractures — Research Paper | ScholarLens