2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Legal Judgment of Real Property Registration and De Facto Right of Things

Ya Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The distinction between de jure right of things recorded in real property register and de facto right of things held by real owner becomes an objective reality.In a legal point of view,the registration publication of real property is an important principle to judge the ownership,whereas the finding of facts is a rarity.There are limits to admit de facto right of things and protect it.The distinction and definition principles should be adopted to coordinate and protect the conflict between de jure and de facto right of things.On the basis of the fact that if the third party interest is involved,the law judge whether de facto right of things has precedence over de jure right of things or not.Then great efforts should be made to improve the relevant system of laws and regulations.There should be different legal reliefs for de facto right of things.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The distinction between de jure right of things recorded in real property register and de facto right of things held by real owner becomes an objective reality.In a legal point of view,the registration publication of real property is an important principle to judge the ownership,whereas the finding of facts is a rarity.There are limits to admit de facto right of things and protect it.The distinction and definition principles should be adopted to coordinate and protect the conflict between de jure and de facto right of things.On the basis of the fact that if the third party interest is involved,the law judge whether de facto right of things has precedence over de jure right of things or not.Then great efforts should be made to improve the relevant system of laws and regulations.There should be different legal reliefs for de facto right of things.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The distinction between de jure right of things recorded in real property register and de facto right of things held by real owner becomes an objective reality.In a legal point of view,the registration publication of real property is an important principle to judge the ownership,whereas the finding of facts is a rarity.There are limits to admit de facto right of things and protect it.The distinction and definition principles should be adopted to coordinate and protect the conflict between de jure and de facto right of things.On the basis of the fact that if the third party interest is involved,the law judge whether de facto right of things has precedence over de jure right of things or not.Then great efforts should be made to improve the relevant system of laws and regulations.There should be different legal reliefs for de facto right of things.

Key concepts: De facto, Property rights, Property (philosophy), Law and economics, Law, Point (geometry), Political science, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Legal Judgment of Real Property Registration and De Facto Right of Things — Research Paper | ScholarLens