2005Academic Journal of Second Military Medical UniversityRequires access

Matrine sustained release tablet, capsule and injection: comparison of pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability

Yan Li

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability between matrine sustained release tablet,matrine conventional capsule and matrine injection. Methods: Dogs were given single oral dose and multiple doses of matrine sustained release tablet, capsule or injection in a randomized crossover way. Matrine concentrations in dog plasma were determined by RP-HPLC method. Results: The results showed that the t max and c max were 300 min and (5.088±0.490) μg/ml for matrine sustained release tablet, (85±12) min and (6.360±0.215) μg/ml for the conventional capsule, and 10 min and (6.500±0.404) μg/ml for the injection. The relative bioavailability of the sustained release tablet was (153.7±9.4)% compared with that of the conventional capsule; the absolute bioavailability of the sustained release tablet was (73.5±14.2)% compared with that of the injecetion. The in vivo absorption rate of the sustained release tablet was significantly correlated with the in vitro release rate(r=0.981 2,P0.01). Conclusion: Matrine sustained release tablet, with sustained release, longer time for reaching peak, and smoothly changing concentration,can meet the requirements for drug design.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability between matrine sustained release tablet,matrine conventional capsule and matrine injection. Methods: Dogs were given single oral dose and multiple doses of matrine sustained release tablet, capsule or injection in a randomized crossover way. Matrine concentrations in dog plasma were determined by RP-HPLC method. Results: The results showed that the t max and c max were 300 min and (5.088±0.490) μg/ml for matrine sustained release tablet, (85±12) min and (6.360±0.215) μg/ml for the conventional capsule, and 10 min and (6.500±0.404) μg/ml for the injection. The relative bioavailability of the sustained release tablet was (153.7±9.4)% compared with that of the conventional capsule; the absolute bioavailability of the sustained release tablet was (73.5±14.2)% compared with that of the injecetion. The in vivo absorption rate of the sustained release tablet was significantly correlated with the in vitro release rate(r=0.981 2,P0.01). Conclusion: Matrine sustained release tablet, with sustained release, longer time for reaching peak, and smoothly changing concentration,can meet the requirements for drug design.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability between matrine sustained release tablet,matrine conventional capsule and matrine injection. Methods: Dogs were given single oral dose and multiple doses of matrine sustained release tablet, capsule or injection in a randomized crossover way. Matrine concentrations in dog plasma were determined by RP-HPLC method. Results: The results showed that the t max and c max were 300 min and (5.088±0.490) μg/ml for matrine sustained release tablet, (85±12) min and (6.360±0.215) μg/ml for the conventional capsule, and 10 min and (6.500±0.404) μg/ml for the injection. The relative bioavailability of the sustained release tablet was (153.7±9.4)% compared with that of the conventional capsule; the absolute bioavailability of the sustained release tablet was (73.5±14.2)% compared with that of the injecetion. The in vivo absorption rate of the sustained release tablet was significantly correlated with the in vitro release rate(r=0.981 2,P0.01). Conclusion: Matrine sustained release tablet, with sustained release, longer time for reaching peak, and smoothly changing concentration,can meet the requirements for drug design.

Key concepts: Matrine, Bioavailability, Capsule, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacology, Crossover study, Chemistry, Dosage form

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Matrine sustained release tablet, capsule and injection: comparison of pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability — Research Paper | ScholarLens