2013Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

Randomized controlled trial on pregablin treating patients with central post stroke pain

Wang Jin-huaa

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of central post stroke pain.METHODS Sixty-five patients were randomly divided to pregabalin group(n = 22),gabapentin group(n = 21) and amitriptyline group(n = 22).The three groups were treated by pregabalin(150 ~ 300 mg.d-1,divided to 2 ~ 3 times,po),gabapentin(300 ~ 1 800 mg.d-1,divided to 1 ~ 3 times,po) and amitriptyline(25 ~ 150 mg.d-1,divided to 2 ~ 3 times,po) respectively for 8 successive weeks.The numeric rating scale(NRS),pain relief(PAR),excellent rate,total effective rate and the adverse drug reactions were recorded pretherapy and in the third day,and the first,second,fourth,and eighth weeks after the therapy.RESULTS Compared with before the treatment,NRS score in the pregabalin group in the third day after the treatment was significantly lower(P 0.05),and remarkably decreased in the first,second,fourth,and eighth week after the treatment(P 0.01).NRS score in the pregabalin group was lower than that of the gabapentin group and the amitriptyline group at the same time points after the treatment(P 0.05).PAR in the pregabalin group was better than that of the gabapentin group and the amitriptyline group at the same time points after the treatment.The excellent rate and the total effective rate of the pregabalin group were higher than those of the gabapentin group and the amitriptyline group at the same time points after the treatment,showing statistical difference(P 0.01).The adverse drug reactions throughout 8 weeks in the pregabalin group were mainly dizziness(18%) and somnolence(14%).There was no significant difference in the incidences of dizziness and somnolence between the pregabalin group and the gabapentin group(P 0.05),but the incidences of dizziness and somnolence in the pregabalin group were lower than those in the amitriptyline group,showing statistical difference(P 0.05).CONCLUSION Pregabalin is effective and safe for the treatment of central post-stroke pain.The clinical efficacy and tolerance of pregabalin are better than gabapentin or amitriptyline.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of central post stroke pain.METHODS Sixty-five patients were randomly divided to pregabalin group(n = 22),gabapentin group(n = 21) and amitriptyline group(n = 22).The three groups were treated by pregabalin(150 ~ 300 mg.d-1,divided to 2 ~ 3 times,po),gabapentin(300 ~ 1 800 mg.d-1,divided to 1 ~ 3 times,po) and amitriptyline(25 ~ 150 mg.d-1,divided to 2 ~ 3 times,po) respectively for 8 successive weeks.The numeric rating scale(NRS),pain relief(PAR),excellent rate,total effective rate and the adverse drug reactions were recorded pretherapy and in the third day,and the first,second,fourth,and eighth weeks after the therapy.RESULTS Compared with before the treatment,NRS score in the pregabalin group in the third day after the treatment was significantly lower(P 0.05),and remarkably decreased in the first,second,fourth,and eighth week after the treatment(P 0.01).NRS score in the pregabalin group was lower than that of the gabapentin group and the amitriptyline group at the same time points after the treatment(P 0.05).PAR in the pregabalin group was better than that of the gabapentin group and the amitriptyline group at the same time points after the treatment.The excellent rate and the total effective rate of the pregabalin group were higher than those of the gabapentin group and the amitriptyline group at the same time points after the treatment,showing statistical difference(P 0.01).The adverse drug reactions throughout 8 weeks in the pregabalin group were mainly dizziness(18%) and somnolence(14%).There was no significant difference in the incidences of dizziness and somnolence between the pregabalin group and the gabapentin group(P 0.05),but the incidences of dizziness and somnolence in the pregabalin group were lower than those in the amitriptyline group,showing statistical difference(P 0.05).CONCLUSION Pregabalin is effective and safe for the treatment of central post-stroke pain.The clinical efficacy and tolerance of pregabalin are better than gabapentin or amitriptyline.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of central post stroke pain.METHODS Sixty-five patients were randomly divided to pregabalin group(n = 22),gabapentin group(n = 21) and amitriptyline group(n = 22).The three groups were treated by pregabalin(150 ~ 300 mg.d-1,divided to 2 ~ 3 times,po),gabapentin(300 ~ 1 800 mg.d-1,divided to 1 ~ 3 times,po) and amitriptyline(25 ~ 150 mg.d-1,divided to 2 ~ 3 times,po) respectively for 8 successive weeks.The numeric rating scale(NRS),pain relief(PAR),excellent rate,total effective rate and the adverse drug reactions were recorded pretherapy and in the third day,and the first,second,fourth,and eighth weeks after the therapy.RESULTS Compared with before the treatment,NRS score in the pregabalin group in the third day after the treatment was significantly lower(P 0.05),and remarkably decreased in the first,second,fourth,and eighth week after the treatment(P 0.01).NRS score in the pregabalin group was lower than that of the gabapentin group and the amitriptyline group at the same time points after the treatment(P 0.05).PAR in the pregabalin group was better than that of the gabapentin group and the amitriptyline group at the same time points after the treatment.The excellent rate and the total effective rate of the pregabalin group were higher than those of the gabapentin group and the amitriptyline group at the same time points after the treatment,showing statistical difference(P 0.01).The adverse drug reactions throughout 8 weeks in the pregabalin group were mainly dizziness(18%) and somnolence(14%).There was no significant difference in the incidences of dizziness and somnolence between the pregabalin group and the gabapentin group(P 0.05),but the incidences of dizziness and somnolence in the pregabalin group were lower than those in the amitriptyline group,showing statistical difference(P 0.05).CONCLUSION Pregabalin is effective and safe for the treatment of central post-stroke pain.The clinical efficacy and tolerance of pregabalin are better than gabapentin or amitriptyline.

Key concepts: Pregabalin, Gabapentin, Amitriptyline, Medicine, Anesthesia, Randomized controlled trial, Adverse effect, Stroke (engine)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Randomized controlled trial on pregablin treating patients with central post stroke pain — Research Paper | ScholarLens