2011PubMedRequires access

[Retrospective controlled study on early postoperative inflammatory small bowel obstruction treated with electroacupuncture and acupuncture].

Xinyu Wang, Zhi-jian Xiong

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To reveal the efficacy on early postoperative inflammatory small bowel obstruction (EPISBO) treated with electroacupuncture and acupuncture separately and make the comparison of the efficacy difference. METHODS: Through retrospective analysis, 459 cases of EPISBO were divided into an electroacupuncture group (355 cases) and an acupuncture group (104 cases). Based on routine treatment, Zusanli (ST 36), Shangjuxu (ST 37), Taichong (LR 3), Gongsun (SP 4) and Xuanzhong (GB 39) were selected in either group, but stimulated with electroacupuncture and acupuncture separately, once per day, for 30 min each time. RESULTS: All of 459 cases were cured. The average days of curative achievement in electroacupuncture group were less apparently than those in acupuncture group (13.5 +/- 7.5 vs. 20.8 +/- 6.5, P < 0.05). The days of curative achievement in either group were less significantly than those treated with parenteral nutrition and medication recorded in literatures (32.0 +/- 7.0, both P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Either electroacupuncture or acupuncture achieves a significant efficacy on EPISBO, but the efficacy of electroacupuncture is better than that of acupuncture.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To reveal the efficacy on early postoperative inflammatory small bowel obstruction (EPISBO) treated with electroacupuncture and acupuncture separately and make the comparison of the efficacy difference. METHODS: Through retrospective analysis, 459 cases of EPISBO were divided into an electroacupuncture group (355 cases) and an acupuncture group (104 cases). Based on routine treatment, Zusanli (ST 36), Shangjuxu (ST 37), Taichong (LR 3), Gongsun (SP 4) and Xuanzhong (GB 39) were selected in either group, but stimulated with electroacupuncture and acupuncture separately, once per day, for 30 min each time. RESULTS: All of 459 cases were cured. The average days of curative achievement in electroacupuncture group were less apparently than those in acupuncture group (13.5 +/- 7.5 vs. 20.8 +/- 6.5, P < 0.05). The days of curative achievement in either group were less significantly than those treated with parenteral nutrition and medication recorded in literatures (32.0 +/- 7.0, both P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Either electroacupuncture or acupuncture achieves a significant efficacy on EPISBO, but the efficacy of electroacupuncture is better than that of acupuncture.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To reveal the efficacy on early postoperative inflammatory small bowel obstruction (EPISBO) treated with electroacupuncture and acupuncture separately and make the comparison of the efficacy difference. METHODS: Through retrospective analysis, 459 cases of EPISBO were divided into an electroacupuncture group (355 cases) and an acupuncture group (104 cases). Based on routine treatment, Zusanli (ST 36), Shangjuxu (ST 37), Taichong (LR 3), Gongsun (SP 4) and Xuanzhong (GB 39) were selected in either group, but stimulated with electroacupuncture and acupuncture separately, once per day, for 30 min each time. RESULTS: All of 459 cases were cured. The average days of curative achievement in electroacupuncture group were less apparently than those in acupuncture group (13.5 +/- 7.5 vs. 20.8 +/- 6.5, P < 0.05). The days of curative achievement in either group were less significantly than those treated with parenteral nutrition and medication recorded in literatures (32.0 +/- 7.0, both P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Either electroacupuncture or acupuncture achieves a significant efficacy on EPISBO, but the efficacy of electroacupuncture is better than that of acupuncture.

Key concepts: Electroacupuncture, Medicine, Zusanli, Acupuncture, Retrospective cohort study, Anesthesia, Therapeutic effect, Significant difference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Retrospective controlled study on early postoperative inflammatory small bowel obstruction treated with electroacupuncture and acupuncture]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens