Application of Solifenacin,a new antimuscarinic agent,to patients with overactive bladder
Pla First
Abstract
Pla First
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Solifenacin in therapy of patients with overactive bladder.Methods A randomized,double-blind,controlled study was carried out in 78 patients with bladder overactivity,who received either Solifenacin(5 mg once daily) or Tolterodine(2 mg twice daily).Results After 12 weeks’treatment,the Solifenacin group showed a significant decrease in the Overactive Bladder Symptoms Score(OABSS) from(9.05 ± 2.38) before the treatment down to(4.06 ± 1.22) after the treatment,and in the times of urinating urgency from(3.97 ± 1.12) down to(1.13 ± 0.44);the Tolterodine group showed a significant decrease in the OABSS from(9.12 ± 2.53) down to(5.22 ± 1.45),and in the times of urinating urgency from(3.85 ± 1.26) down to(1.98 ± 0.56).The effects of Solifenacin on these two micturition variables were more significantly improved than that of Tolterodine(P 0.05).The total incidence of adverse events was 10% in the Solifenacin group and 21.05% in the Tolterodine group,between which there was a significant difference(P 0.05).Conclusion Compared with toherodine,Solifenacin,a new antimuscarinic agent,is more effective and safer in the treatment of overactive bladder.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Solifenacin in therapy of patients with overactive bladder.Methods A randomized,double-blind,controlled study was carried out in 78 patients with bladder overactivity,who received either Solifenacin(5 mg once daily) or Tolterodine(2 mg twice daily).Results After 12 weeks’treatment,the Solifenacin group showed a significant decrease in the Overactive Bladder Symptoms Score(OABSS) from(9.05 ± 2.38) before the treatment down to(4.06 ± 1.22) after the treatment,and in the times of urinating urgency from(3.97 ± 1.12) down to(1.13 ± 0.44);the Tolterodine group showed a significant decrease in the OABSS from(9.12 ± 2.53) down to(5.22 ± 1.45),and in the times of urinating urgency from(3.85 ± 1.26) down to(1.98 ± 0.56).The effects of Solifenacin on these two micturition variables were more significantly improved than that of Tolterodine(P 0.05).The total incidence of adverse events was 10% in the Solifenacin group and 21.05% in the Tolterodine group,between which there was a significant difference(P 0.05).Conclusion Compared with toherodine,Solifenacin,a new antimuscarinic agent,is more effective and safer in the treatment of overactive bladder.
Key concepts: Solifenacin, Tolterodine, Overactive bladder, Medicine, Urology, Urination, Internal medicine, Urinary system