Four Theses On the Issue of Value
YU Wu-ji
Abstract
YU Wu-ji
Abstract
The word is one of the concepts which people often use without giving a definite meaning. It’s necessary for people to make clear various misunderstandings on the concept of value in order to set up a basic consensus, and this paper tries to investigate such consensus. First of all, value is not equal to use-value; secondly, the objective value-relationship differs greatly from the subjective value-judgment; thirdly, the critical value-pluralism is more rational than the natural value-pluralism; fourthly, we should choose the revised value-system of modernity rather than value-system of modernity.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The word is one of the concepts which people often use without giving a definite meaning. It’s necessary for people to make clear various misunderstandings on the concept of value in order to set up a basic consensus, and this paper tries to investigate such consensus. First of all, value is not equal to use-value; secondly, the objective value-relationship differs greatly from the subjective value-judgment; thirdly, the critical value-pluralism is more rational than the natural value-pluralism; fourthly, we should choose the revised value-system of modernity rather than value-system of modernity.
Key concepts: Value (mathematics), Epistemology, Pluralism (philosophy), Value pluralism, Modernity, Meaning (existential), Positive economics, Sociology