2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

Cross resistance of methamidophos resistant strain of brown planthopper and the biochemical mechanism responsible

Z. W. n Liu, Zhengshuo Han, L. C. un Zhang

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The R strain selected for methamidophos resistance displayed 43 74 fold resistance to methamidophos and also had cross resistance to malathion, diazinon, isoprocarb, fenobucarb and ethofenprox, but no cross resistance to fenvalerate and imidacloprid. To find out the biochemical mechanism of resistance to methamidophos and cross resistance to other insecticides, we performed synergistic bioassay and biochemical assay. In R strain, the synergistic bioassay showed that TPP (triphenyl phosphate) significantly synergized methamidophos (SR: 4 52) and moderately synergized malathion (SR: 2 76), diazinon (SR: 2 07), fenobucarb (SR: 2 17) and isoprocarb (SR: 1 64). PBO (piperonyl butoxide) partially synergized methamidophos (SR:2 24),malathion (SR: 1 86) and ethofenprox (SR: 1 73). Biochemical assay showed that esterase activity in the R strain was 7 93 times that in S strain,in which the changed activity for MFO was 1 98 and for GST only 1 44 TPP could significantly inhibit esterase activity (PI:69 04%) in the R strain, with MFO's PI 29 30% by PBO. The results indicated that esterase played important role in the biochemical mechanism of methamidophos resistance and, to a lesser extent, cross resistance to malathion, diazinon, fenobucarb and isoprocarb. MFO might play some role in resistance to methamidophos and cross resistance to malathion and ethofenprox.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The R strain selected for methamidophos resistance displayed 43 74 fold resistance to methamidophos and also had cross resistance to malathion, diazinon, isoprocarb, fenobucarb and ethofenprox, but no cross resistance to fenvalerate and imidacloprid. To find out the biochemical mechanism of resistance to methamidophos and cross resistance to other insecticides, we performed synergistic bioassay and biochemical assay. In R strain, the synergistic bioassay showed that TPP (triphenyl phosphate) significantly synergized methamidophos (SR: 4 52) and moderately synergized malathion (SR: 2 76), diazinon (SR: 2 07), fenobucarb (SR: 2 17) and isoprocarb (SR: 1 64). PBO (piperonyl butoxide) partially synergized methamidophos (SR:2 24),malathion (SR: 1 86) and ethofenprox (SR: 1 73). Biochemical assay showed that esterase activity in the R strain was 7 93 times that in S strain,in which the changed activity for MFO was 1 98 and for GST only 1 44 TPP could significantly inhibit esterase activity (PI:69 04%) in the R strain, with MFO's PI 29 30% by PBO. The results indicated that esterase played important role in the biochemical mechanism of methamidophos resistance and, to a lesser extent, cross resistance to malathion, diazinon, fenobucarb and isoprocarb. MFO might play some role in resistance to methamidophos and cross resistance to malathion and ethofenprox.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The R strain selected for methamidophos resistance displayed 43 74 fold resistance to methamidophos and also had cross resistance to malathion, diazinon, isoprocarb, fenobucarb and ethofenprox, but no cross resistance to fenvalerate and imidacloprid. To find out the biochemical mechanism of resistance to methamidophos and cross resistance to other insecticides, we performed synergistic bioassay and biochemical assay. In R strain, the synergistic bioassay showed that TPP (triphenyl phosphate) significantly synergized methamidophos (SR: 4 52) and moderately synergized malathion (SR: 2 76), diazinon (SR: 2 07), fenobucarb (SR: 2 17) and isoprocarb (SR: 1 64). PBO (piperonyl butoxide) partially synergized methamidophos (SR:2 24),malathion (SR: 1 86) and ethofenprox (SR: 1 73). Biochemical assay showed that esterase activity in the R strain was 7 93 times that in S strain,in which the changed activity for MFO was 1 98 and for GST only 1 44 TPP could significantly inhibit esterase activity (PI:69 04%) in the R strain, with MFO's PI 29 30% by PBO. The results indicated that esterase played important role in the biochemical mechanism of methamidophos resistance and, to a lesser extent, cross resistance to malathion, diazinon, fenobucarb and isoprocarb. MFO might play some role in resistance to methamidophos and cross resistance to malathion and ethofenprox.

Key concepts: Methamidophos, Malathion, Piperonyl butoxide, Diazinon, Cross-resistance, Esterase, Biology, Toxicology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cross resistance of methamidophos resistant strain of brown planthopper and the biochemical mechanism responsible — Research Paper | ScholarLens