2005Ziran zaihai xuebaoRequires access

Comparative study on flood risk analysis in Netherlands and China

Xing Zheng Wu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Based on a general definition of flood risk,similarities and differences in the flood risk analysis method between the Netherlands and China are described in this paper.Studied aspects include the determination of flooding probability,flood consequences,flood risk indexes and flood prevention economy optimization.Features of each method and causes of the differences between two countries are primarily analyzed.In the case study of the Anqing dike,the flood risk analysis methods in the Netherlands and China are investigated respectively,and a combination of these two methods is proposed.The result indicates that the method combining structural failure probability of dike and hydrological risk probability of flood together to determine the flood hazard agrees well with Chinese flood conditions.More uncertainties are considered in determination of flood risk in this new method.It is suggested to apply this method to the further flood risk analysis in China.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Based on a general definition of flood risk,similarities and differences in the flood risk analysis method between the Netherlands and China are described in this paper.Studied aspects include the determination of flooding probability,flood consequences,flood risk indexes and flood prevention economy optimization.Features of each method and causes of the differences between two countries are primarily analyzed.In the case study of the Anqing dike,the flood risk analysis methods in the Netherlands and China are investigated respectively,and a combination of these two methods is proposed.The result indicates that the method combining structural failure probability of dike and hydrological risk probability of flood together to determine the flood hazard agrees well with Chinese flood conditions.More uncertainties are considered in determination of flood risk in this new method.It is suggested to apply this method to the further flood risk analysis in China.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Based on a general definition of flood risk,similarities and differences in the flood risk analysis method between the Netherlands and China are described in this paper.Studied aspects include the determination of flooding probability,flood consequences,flood risk indexes and flood prevention economy optimization.Features of each method and causes of the differences between two countries are primarily analyzed.In the case study of the Anqing dike,the flood risk analysis methods in the Netherlands and China are investigated respectively,and a combination of these two methods is proposed.The result indicates that the method combining structural failure probability of dike and hydrological risk probability of flood together to determine the flood hazard agrees well with Chinese flood conditions.More uncertainties are considered in determination of flood risk in this new method.It is suggested to apply this method to the further flood risk analysis in China.

Key concepts: Flood myth, China, Flooding (psychology), Flood risk assessment, 100-year flood, Risk analysis (engineering), Geography, Dike

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study on flood risk analysis in Netherlands and China — Research Paper | ScholarLens