2010Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

A randomized,double blind,and parallel controlled multicenter clinical trial of reboxetine in treatment of depression

Peixian Mao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of reboxetine in adult patients with depression. METHODS In this randomized,double blind,fluoxetine parallel controlled,multicenter clinical trial,240 patients were randomly divided into reboxetine group and fluoxetine group at the ratio of 1:1.The daily dose of reboxetine and fluoxetine was 4 mg and 10 mg respectively in the first 3 days,and then from the 4th day the daily dose was 8 mg and 20 mg respectively.The treatment period was 6 weeks.At the end of wk 1,2,4,and 6,HAMD17,HAMA,CGI-I,and CGI-S were used to assess the therapeutic efficacy.Safety evaluation indicators included the adverse reactions,as well as physical,vital signs,electrocardiograph examination,and clinical laboratory tests at the baseline and the end of the trial or the premature cessation.RESULTS The patients of the reboxetine group and the fluoxetine group were 118 and 117 in the intent-to-treat set,110 and 108 in the per-protocol set,and 120 and 117 in the safety analysis set.At the end of wk 1,2,4,and 6,the HAMD17 scores and reduction rates had no significant difference between the two groups(P0.05).The reduction rates of HAMA scores at the end of wk 1 had very significant difference between the two groups(P0.01),with no difference at the other time points(P0.05).At the end of wk 6,there was no significant difference in the effective(reduction rate of HAMD≥50%) rates and cure(total HAMD score≤7) rates between the two groups.The adverse reaction rates between the two groups had no significant difference(P0.05).The main adverse reactions of reboxetine contained dizziness,dry mouth,constipation,and dysuria, but they all emerged in the early stage and were mild,transient,and could be alleviated when no drug administration.CONCLUSION Reboxetine have the same efficacy and safety as fluoxetine in treating depression,and reboxetine has a much more rapid onset than fluoxetine especially in improving anxiety.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of reboxetine in adult patients with depression. METHODS In this randomized,double blind,fluoxetine parallel controlled,multicenter clinical trial,240 patients were randomly divided into reboxetine group and fluoxetine group at the ratio of 1:1.The daily dose of reboxetine and fluoxetine was 4 mg and 10 mg respectively in the first 3 days,and then from the 4th day the daily dose was 8 mg and 20 mg respectively.The treatment period was 6 weeks.At the end of wk 1,2,4,and 6,HAMD17,HAMA,CGI-I,and CGI-S were used to assess the therapeutic efficacy.Safety evaluation indicators included the adverse reactions,as well as physical,vital signs,electrocardiograph examination,and clinical laboratory tests at the baseline and the end of the trial or the premature cessation.RESULTS The patients of the reboxetine group and the fluoxetine group were 118 and 117 in the intent-to-treat set,110 and 108 in the per-protocol set,and 120 and 117 in the safety analysis set.At the end of wk 1,2,4,and 6,the HAMD17 scores and reduction rates had no significant difference between the two groups(P0.05).The reduction rates of HAMA scores at the end of wk 1 had very significant difference between the two groups(P0.01),with no difference at the other time points(P0.05).At the end of wk 6,there was no significant difference in the effective(reduction rate of HAMD≥50%) rates and cure(total HAMD score≤7) rates between the two groups.The adverse reaction rates between the two groups had no significant difference(P0.05).The main adverse reactions of reboxetine contained dizziness,dry mouth,constipation,and dysuria, but they all emerged in the early stage and were mild,transient,and could be alleviated when no drug administration.CONCLUSION Reboxetine have the same efficacy and safety as fluoxetine in treating depression,and reboxetine has a much more rapid onset than fluoxetine especially in improving anxiety.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of reboxetine in adult patients with depression. METHODS In this randomized,double blind,fluoxetine parallel controlled,multicenter clinical trial,240 patients were randomly divided into reboxetine group and fluoxetine group at the ratio of 1:1.The daily dose of reboxetine and fluoxetine was 4 mg and 10 mg respectively in the first 3 days,and then from the 4th day the daily dose was 8 mg and 20 mg respectively.The treatment period was 6 weeks.At the end of wk 1,2,4,and 6,HAMD17,HAMA,CGI-I,and CGI-S were used to assess the therapeutic efficacy.Safety evaluation indicators included the adverse reactions,as well as physical,vital signs,electrocardiograph examination,and clinical laboratory tests at the baseline and the end of the trial or the premature cessation.RESULTS The patients of the reboxetine group and the fluoxetine group were 118 and 117 in the intent-to-treat set,110 and 108 in the per-protocol set,and 120 and 117 in the safety analysis set.At the end of wk 1,2,4,and 6,the HAMD17 scores and reduction rates had no significant difference between the two groups(P0.05).The reduction rates of HAMA scores at the end of wk 1 had very significant difference between the two groups(P0.01),with no difference at the other time points(P0.05).At the end of wk 6,there was no significant difference in the effective(reduction rate of HAMD≥50%) rates and cure(total HAMD score≤7) rates between the two groups.The adverse reaction rates between the two groups had no significant difference(P0.05).The main adverse reactions of reboxetine contained dizziness,dry mouth,constipation,and dysuria, but they all emerged in the early stage and were mild,transient,and could be alleviated when no drug administration.CONCLUSION Reboxetine have the same efficacy and safety as fluoxetine in treating depression,and reboxetine has a much more rapid onset than fluoxetine especially in improving anxiety.

Key concepts: Reboxetine, Fluoxetine, Randomized controlled trial, Medicine, Clinical trial, Hamd, Significant difference, Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A randomized,double blind,and parallel controlled multicenter clinical trial of reboxetine in treatment of depression — Research Paper | ScholarLens