2010•Journal of Jilin UniversityRequires access

Comparsion of immunological efficacy of two methods of H1N1 influenza vaccine

Qi Hui

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare of immunological efficacy of H1N1influenza vaccine 0done-dose method and 0, 21d,two-dose method,and observe whether seasonal influenza vaccine has cross protection for H1N1influenza virus.Methods H1N1influenza vaccine with two immunological methods was used to inoculate Balb/c mice.The first,the Balb/c mice were inoculated in 0d.The second,the Balb/c mice were inoculated in 0and 21d.The serum from orbital in 14,21,28,35,42dafter the first-dose were separated.HI was performed to determine the H1N1-specific serum antibody titers to compare the immune effect of the two immunological methods.Then the Balb/c mice were inoculated with seasonal influenza vaccine.The serum from orbital in 14and 28dwere separated. HI was performed to determine whether the anti-serum of seasonal influenza vaccine could non-specificly bind with H1N1influenza virus-specific antigens.Results The 28,35and 42dantibody titers of the two-dose method were significantly higher than those of one-dose methods after the second immunity at the 21th day.And the 42d antibody titers of the two-dose methods were 4times of that of one-dose methods.HI was performed to determine the anti-serum of seasonal influenza vaccine,there were is no H1N1influenza virus-specific antibodis in it. Conclusion The antibody titers of 0and 21dtwo-dose method still maintain the high level at 28th day,and are obviously higher than those of one-dose methods.There is no cross-protective immunity betweenseasonalinfluenzavaccine and influenza A H1N1influenza virus.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare of immunological efficacy of H1N1influenza vaccine 0done-dose method and 0, 21d,two-dose method,and observe whether seasonal influenza vaccine has cross protection for H1N1influenza virus.Methods H1N1influenza vaccine with two immunological methods was used to inoculate Balb/c mice.The first,the Balb/c mice were inoculated in 0d.The second,the Balb/c mice were inoculated in 0and 21d.The serum from orbital in 14,21,28,35,42dafter the first-dose were separated.HI was performed to determine the H1N1-specific serum antibody titers to compare the immune effect of the two immunological methods.Then the Balb/c mice were inoculated with seasonal influenza vaccine.The serum from orbital in 14and 28dwere separated. HI was performed to determine whether the anti-serum of seasonal influenza vaccine could non-specificly bind with H1N1influenza virus-specific antigens.Results The 28,35and 42dantibody titers of the two-dose method were significantly higher than those of one-dose methods after the second immunity at the 21th day.And the 42d antibody titers of the two-dose methods were 4times of that of one-dose methods.HI was performed to determine the anti-serum of seasonal influenza vaccine,there were is no H1N1influenza virus-specific antibodis in it. Conclusion The antibody titers of 0and 21dtwo-dose method still maintain the high level at 28th day,and are obviously higher than those of one-dose methods.There is no cross-protective immunity betweenseasonalinfluenzavaccine and influenza A H1N1influenza virus.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare of immunological efficacy of H1N1influenza vaccine 0done-dose method and 0, 21d,two-dose method,and observe whether seasonal influenza vaccine has cross protection for H1N1influenza virus.Methods H1N1influenza vaccine with two immunological methods was used to inoculate Balb/c mice.The first,the Balb/c mice were inoculated in 0d.The second,the Balb/c mice were inoculated in 0and 21d.The serum from orbital in 14,21,28,35,42dafter the first-dose were separated.HI was performed to determine the H1N1-specific serum antibody titers to compare the immune effect of the two immunological methods.Then the Balb/c mice were inoculated with seasonal influenza vaccine.The serum from orbital in 14and 28dwere separated. HI was performed to determine whether the anti-serum of seasonal influenza vaccine could non-specificly bind with H1N1influenza virus-specific antigens.Results The 28,35and 42dantibody titers of the two-dose method were significantly higher than those of one-dose methods after the second immunity at the 21th day.And the 42d antibody titers of the two-dose methods were 4times of that of one-dose methods.HI was performed to determine the anti-serum of seasonal influenza vaccine,there were is no H1N1influenza virus-specific antibodis in it. Conclusion The antibody titers of 0and 21dtwo-dose method still maintain the high level at 28th day,and are obviously higher than those of one-dose methods.There is no cross-protective immunity betweenseasonalinfluenzavaccine and influenza A H1N1influenza virus.

Key concepts: Titer, Antibody, Immunity, Inoculation, Antibody titer, Medicine, Virus, Influenza vaccine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparsion of immunological efficacy of two methods of H1N1 influenza vaccine — Research Paper | ScholarLens