2007The Chinese Journal of Clinical PharmacologyRequires access

Bioequivalence of glipizide controlled-release tablets in Chinese healthy volunteers

Huimin Qi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of two glipizide controlled -release preparations in healthy volunteers.Methods The tests were carried out according to single dosage regimen and multiple dosage regimen in a open crossover design. In single dosage regimen, 24 enrolled healthy volunteers were randomized given 5mg of test or reference preparation.In multiple dosage regimen,22 enrolled subjects were given 5 mg of test or reference preparation once daily for 7 consecutive days. LC-MS/MS was used to determine the glipizide concentration in serum. Pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability were calculated, and bioequivalence of the two preparations was evaluated.Results The main pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated as follows:In single dosage regimen, for reference and test preparations, t1/2β were (9.12±2.73), (8.60±4.43)h ;tmax were (10.67±5.13), (9.08±2.76)h;Cmax were (135.9 ±41.1),(157.9±25.3)ng·mL-1;AUC0-48 were (2852.0±946.6), (3021.5±899.9)ng·h·mL-1;AUC0-∞ were (3002.4±1107.6), (3167.6±1090.6) ng·h·mL-1 respectively. The relative bioavailability was (109.2 ±25.4)%.In multiple dosage regimen,for reference and test preparations, t1/2β were (11.31±3.37), (10.97±3.49 )h; tmax were (6.8 ±3.5), (6.6±3.7) h; Cssmax were (187.4±54.5), (176.0±72.3) ng·mL; Cssmin were (61.3 ±28.1), (69.1±41.2 )ng·mL; AUC0-48 were (3495.0 ±1110.6), (3488.2±1554.9)ng·h·mL-1;AUC0-∞ were (3670.7±1199.7), (3650.5±1599.2) ng·h·mL-1,respectively. The relative bioavailability was (101.0 ±32.1)%.DF were (56.2 ±19.9)%,(49.7±22.5)% for reference and test preparation,respectively.Conclusion The two preparations were bioequivalent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of two glipizide controlled -release preparations in healthy volunteers.Methods The tests were carried out according to single dosage regimen and multiple dosage regimen in a open crossover design. In single dosage regimen, 24 enrolled healthy volunteers were randomized given 5mg of test or reference preparation.In multiple dosage regimen,22 enrolled subjects were given 5 mg of test or reference preparation once daily for 7 consecutive days. LC-MS/MS was used to determine the glipizide concentration in serum. Pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability were calculated, and bioequivalence of the two preparations was evaluated.Results The main pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated as follows:In single dosage regimen, for reference and test preparations, t1/2β were (9.12±2.73), (8.60±4.43)h ;tmax were (10.67±5.13), (9.08±2.76)h;Cmax were (135.9 ±41.1),(157.9±25.3)ng·mL-1;AUC0-48 were (2852.0±946.6), (3021.5±899.9)ng·h·mL-1;AUC0-∞ were (3002.4±1107.6), (3167.6±1090.6) ng·h·mL-1 respectively. The relative bioavailability was (109.2 ±25.4)%.In multiple dosage regimen,for reference and test preparations, t1/2β were (11.31±3.37), (10.97±3.49 )h; tmax were (6.8 ±3.5), (6.6±3.7) h; Cssmax were (187.4±54.5), (176.0±72.3) ng·mL; Cssmin were (61.3 ±28.1), (69.1±41.2 )ng·mL; AUC0-48 were (3495.0 ±1110.6), (3488.2±1554.9)ng·h·mL-1;AUC0-∞ were (3670.7±1199.7), (3650.5±1599.2) ng·h·mL-1,respectively. The relative bioavailability was (101.0 ±32.1)%.DF were (56.2 ±19.9)%,(49.7±22.5)% for reference and test preparation,respectively.Conclusion The two preparations were bioequivalent.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of two glipizide controlled -release preparations in healthy volunteers.Methods The tests were carried out according to single dosage regimen and multiple dosage regimen in a open crossover design. In single dosage regimen, 24 enrolled healthy volunteers were randomized given 5mg of test or reference preparation.In multiple dosage regimen,22 enrolled subjects were given 5 mg of test or reference preparation once daily for 7 consecutive days. LC-MS/MS was used to determine the glipizide concentration in serum. Pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability were calculated, and bioequivalence of the two preparations was evaluated.Results The main pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated as follows:In single dosage regimen, for reference and test preparations, t1/2β were (9.12±2.73), (8.60±4.43)h ;tmax were (10.67±5.13), (9.08±2.76)h;Cmax were (135.9 ±41.1),(157.9±25.3)ng·mL-1;AUC0-48 were (2852.0±946.6), (3021.5±899.9)ng·h·mL-1;AUC0-∞ were (3002.4±1107.6), (3167.6±1090.6) ng·h·mL-1 respectively. The relative bioavailability was (109.2 ±25.4)%.In multiple dosage regimen,for reference and test preparations, t1/2β were (11.31±3.37), (10.97±3.49 )h; tmax were (6.8 ±3.5), (6.6±3.7) h; Cssmax were (187.4±54.5), (176.0±72.3) ng·mL; Cssmin were (61.3 ±28.1), (69.1±41.2 )ng·mL; AUC0-48 were (3495.0 ±1110.6), (3488.2±1554.9)ng·h·mL-1;AUC0-∞ were (3670.7±1199.7), (3650.5±1599.2) ng·h·mL-1,respectively. The relative bioavailability was (101.0 ±32.1)%.DF were (56.2 ±19.9)%,(49.7±22.5)% for reference and test preparation,respectively.Conclusion The two preparations were bioequivalent.

Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Regimen, Cmax, Pharmacokinetics, Crossover study, Pharmacology, Glipizide

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioequivalence of glipizide controlled-release tablets in Chinese healthy volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens