2014Chinese Computed Medical ImagingRequires access

Feasibility of Low Tube Voltage CTA in Abdominal Aorta and Lower Extremity Artery

Mi Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the radiation dose and image quality of abdominal aorta and lower extremity artery CTA by using 80 kV and 120 kV tube voltage on a 128-slice CT and to evaluate the feasibility of low tube voltage technique. Methods: Forty-eight patients who underwent abdominal aorta and lower extremity artery CTA were randomly assigned to two different protocols in this trial: group A(n=24) was examined with 120-kV protocol and group B(n=24) was examined with 80-kV protocol. Objective indices such as vascular attenuation, image noise(N) and contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR) were analyzed. Subjective image quality was assessed by two observers in consensus using a four-point scale. Dose length product(DLP) was recorded. Image quality and radiation dose were compared with t test between the two groups. Results: Vessel attenuation was significantly higher in group B than that in group A(P0.05). Noise was significantly higher in group B than that in group A(57.95±19.23HU vs. 22.78±6.15HU, P0.05),however, there was no significant difference of CNR between them(15.69±5.39 vs.14.85±5.61, P﹥0.05). Subjective image quality was rated similar in both groups(P0.05). The effective dose of group B was significantly lower than that of group A(DLP:274.96±20.72 mGy·cm vs. 1025.50±64.15 mGy·cm, P0.05). Conclusion: Eighty kV tube voltage is feasible for abdominal aorta and lower extremity artery CTA, the radiation dose can be significantly reduced and the image quality can meet the diagnostic request.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: To compare the radiation dose and image quality of abdominal aorta and lower extremity artery CTA by using 80 kV and 120 kV tube voltage on a 128-slice CT and to evaluate the feasibility of low tube voltage technique. Methods: Forty-eight patients who underwent abdominal aorta and lower extremity artery CTA were randomly assigned to two different protocols in this trial: group A(n=24) was examined with 120-kV protocol and group B(n=24) was examined with 80-kV protocol. Objective indices such as vascular attenuation, image noise(N) and contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR) were analyzed. Subjective image quality was assessed by two observers in consensus using a four-point scale. Dose length product(DLP) was recorded. Image quality and radiation dose were compared with t test between the two groups. Results: Vessel attenuation was significantly higher in group B than that in group A(P0.05). Noise was significantly higher in group B than that in group A(57.95±19.23HU vs. 22.78±6.15HU, P0.05),however, there was no significant difference of CNR between them(15.69±5.39 vs.14.85±5.61, P﹥0.05). Subjective image quality was rated similar in both groups(P0.05). The effective dose of group B was significantly lower than that of group A(DLP:274.96±20.72 mGy·cm vs. 1025.50±64.15 mGy·cm, P0.05). Conclusion: Eighty kV tube voltage is feasible for abdominal aorta and lower extremity artery CTA, the radiation dose can be significantly reduced and the image quality can meet the diagnostic request.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: To compare the radiation dose and image quality of abdominal aorta and lower extremity artery CTA by using 80 kV and 120 kV tube voltage on a 128-slice CT and to evaluate the feasibility of low tube voltage technique. Methods: Forty-eight patients who underwent abdominal aorta and lower extremity artery CTA were randomly assigned to two different protocols in this trial: group A(n=24) was examined with 120-kV protocol and group B(n=24) was examined with 80-kV protocol. Objective indices such as vascular attenuation, image noise(N) and contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR) were analyzed. Subjective image quality was assessed by two observers in consensus using a four-point scale. Dose length product(DLP) was recorded. Image quality and radiation dose were compared with t test between the two groups. Results: Vessel attenuation was significantly higher in group B than that in group A(P0.05). Noise was significantly higher in group B than that in group A(57.95±19.23HU vs. 22.78±6.15HU, P0.05),however, there was no significant difference of CNR between them(15.69±5.39 vs.14.85±5.61, P﹥0.05). Subjective image quality was rated similar in both groups(P0.05). The effective dose of group B was significantly lower than that of group A(DLP:274.96±20.72 mGy·cm vs. 1025.50±64.15 mGy·cm, P0.05). Conclusion: Eighty kV tube voltage is feasible for abdominal aorta and lower extremity artery CTA, the radiation dose can be significantly reduced and the image quality can meet the diagnostic request.

Key concepts: Medicine, Abdominal aorta, Image quality, Aorta, Nuclear medicine, Image noise, Artery, Radiation dose

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Feasibility of Low Tube Voltage CTA in Abdominal Aorta and Lower Extremity Artery — Research Paper | ScholarLens