2010Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational CollegeRequires access

The Practicality of Loan Contract between the Natural Persons——Reconsidering The Article 210 of Contract Law

Jing Fan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The necessity of practice contract is challenged by the principle of autonomy.The Article 210 of China's Contract Law prescribes this contract as practical,which is not doubted in the judicial practice,but there are many theoretical circles.Firstly,legislation is not clear why the lending as the element of contract enforcement,which is different from storage contracts.This is detrimental to the system of coherence;secondly,prescribing lending as a mandatory elements is legitimate intervention in the private sector.Thirdly,we should distinguish the contract when paid and unpaid,as the right condition is obviously different.It is necessary for this provision of China's Contract Law to be re-framed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The necessity of practice contract is challenged by the principle of autonomy.The Article 210 of China's Contract Law prescribes this contract as practical,which is not doubted in the judicial practice,but there are many theoretical circles.Firstly,legislation is not clear why the lending as the element of contract enforcement,which is different from storage contracts.This is detrimental to the system of coherence;secondly,prescribing lending as a mandatory elements is legitimate intervention in the private sector.Thirdly,we should distinguish the contract when paid and unpaid,as the right condition is obviously different.It is necessary for this provision of China's Contract Law to be re-framed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The necessity of practice contract is challenged by the principle of autonomy.The Article 210 of China's Contract Law prescribes this contract as practical,which is not doubted in the judicial practice,but there are many theoretical circles.Firstly,legislation is not clear why the lending as the element of contract enforcement,which is different from storage contracts.This is detrimental to the system of coherence;secondly,prescribing lending as a mandatory elements is legitimate intervention in the private sector.Thirdly,we should distinguish the contract when paid and unpaid,as the right condition is obviously different.It is necessary for this provision of China's Contract Law to be re-framed.

Key concepts: Exclusion clause, Enforcement, Severability, Contract management, Business, Legislation, Frustration of purpose, Loan

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Practicality of Loan Contract between the Natural Persons——Reconsidering The Article 210 of Contract Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens