2009China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary MedicineRequires access

The Applied Research on the RT-PCR Nucleic Acid Detection and ELISA Antigen Detection Kit of CSFV

Zhang Yi-fang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In order to analyze the differences between RT-PCR and ELISA antigen detection methods in classical swine fever virus detection,120 clinical samples were detected by the two methods.According to the study released by the NCBI swine fever virus strain Shi-men E2 gene sequence,design and synthesis of a pair of detection of classical swine fever virus E2 gene PCR primer.Submitted to the 120 suspected swine fever disease compound extracted total RNA,after one-step RT-PCR amplification of E2 gene,checked out 32 samples were expected to contain swine fever antigen,positive rate was 26.7%.ELISA antigen detection kit checked out 38 samples were expected to contain swine fever antigen,positive rate was 31.7%.One-step RT-PCR detected 32 positive samples were also positive in the detection of ELISA.The establishment of classical swine fever virus RT-PCR detection of nucleic acid and antigen detection ELISA.Pathogen detection of classical swine fever supplied technical support for the provision of Yunnan.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to analyze the differences between RT-PCR and ELISA antigen detection methods in classical swine fever virus detection,120 clinical samples were detected by the two methods.According to the study released by the NCBI swine fever virus strain Shi-men E2 gene sequence,design and synthesis of a pair of detection of classical swine fever virus E2 gene PCR primer.Submitted to the 120 suspected swine fever disease compound extracted total RNA,after one-step RT-PCR amplification of E2 gene,checked out 32 samples were expected to contain swine fever antigen,positive rate was 26.7%.ELISA antigen detection kit checked out 38 samples were expected to contain swine fever antigen,positive rate was 31.7%.One-step RT-PCR detected 32 positive samples were also positive in the detection of ELISA.The establishment of classical swine fever virus RT-PCR detection of nucleic acid and antigen detection ELISA.Pathogen detection of classical swine fever supplied technical support for the provision of Yunnan.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to analyze the differences between RT-PCR and ELISA antigen detection methods in classical swine fever virus detection,120 clinical samples were detected by the two methods.According to the study released by the NCBI swine fever virus strain Shi-men E2 gene sequence,design and synthesis of a pair of detection of classical swine fever virus E2 gene PCR primer.Submitted to the 120 suspected swine fever disease compound extracted total RNA,after one-step RT-PCR amplification of E2 gene,checked out 32 samples were expected to contain swine fever antigen,positive rate was 26.7%.ELISA antigen detection kit checked out 38 samples were expected to contain swine fever antigen,positive rate was 31.7%.One-step RT-PCR detected 32 positive samples were also positive in the detection of ELISA.The establishment of classical swine fever virus RT-PCR detection of nucleic acid and antigen detection ELISA.Pathogen detection of classical swine fever supplied technical support for the provision of Yunnan.

Key concepts: Classical swine fever, Virology, Antigen, Virus, Primer (cosmetics), Biology, Nucleic acid, African swine fever

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Applied Research on the RT-PCR Nucleic Acid Detection and ELISA Antigen Detection Kit of CSFV — Research Paper | ScholarLens