Interpretation of basic category of judicial information disclosure
Dong Ya
Abstract
Dong Ya
Abstract
The scope of judicial information disclosure is wider than the scope of the judicial openness.In addition to litigation information,the scope of judicial information also includes judicial administrative information.The disclosure of judicial administrative information is conducive to the maintenance of judicial justice,the establishment of prestige of judicial agencies in the public,and the development of judicial supervision.There are exceptions to the disclosure of judicial information.According to the importance of exception rules,the exceptions can be classified into the exceptions of state secrets and public interests,the exceptions of the third party interests,and the exceptions of administrative functions.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The scope of judicial information disclosure is wider than the scope of the judicial openness.In addition to litigation information,the scope of judicial information also includes judicial administrative information.The disclosure of judicial administrative information is conducive to the maintenance of judicial justice,the establishment of prestige of judicial agencies in the public,and the development of judicial supervision.There are exceptions to the disclosure of judicial information.According to the importance of exception rules,the exceptions can be classified into the exceptions of state secrets and public interests,the exceptions of the third party interests,and the exceptions of administrative functions.
Key concepts: Scope (computer science), Political science, Openness to experience, Prestige, Judicial discretion, Judicial activism, Judicial opinion, Judicial interpretation