2011China Medical HeraldRequires access

Treatments of distal femur fractures with intramedullary nails and locking plates: the difference of callus formation

Sun Tian-sheng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: Through comparison of clinical effect in distal femur fractures stabilized with locking plates and intramedullary nails to test the difference of callus formation between intramedullary nails and locking plates.Methods: 156 distal femur fractures were reviewed to extract cases treated individually with retrograde IM nails(n=12),and treated with locking plates(n=12).Periosteal callus was measured on lateral and antero-posterior radiographs taken at 12 weeks after injury using validated software to objectively extract the size of peripheral callus from digital radiographs.Results: The nail group had 2.4 times more callus area per location(233±280 mm2) than the plate group(95±109 mm2,P=0.028).Conclusion: Significantly less periosteal callus formed in fractures stabilized with locking plates than with IM nails.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: Through comparison of clinical effect in distal femur fractures stabilized with locking plates and intramedullary nails to test the difference of callus formation between intramedullary nails and locking plates.Methods: 156 distal femur fractures were reviewed to extract cases treated individually with retrograde IM nails(n=12),and treated with locking plates(n=12).Periosteal callus was measured on lateral and antero-posterior radiographs taken at 12 weeks after injury using validated software to objectively extract the size of peripheral callus from digital radiographs.Results: The nail group had 2.4 times more callus area per location(233±280 mm2) than the plate group(95±109 mm2,P=0.028).Conclusion: Significantly less periosteal callus formed in fractures stabilized with locking plates than with IM nails.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: Through comparison of clinical effect in distal femur fractures stabilized with locking plates and intramedullary nails to test the difference of callus formation between intramedullary nails and locking plates.Methods: 156 distal femur fractures were reviewed to extract cases treated individually with retrograde IM nails(n=12),and treated with locking plates(n=12).Periosteal callus was measured on lateral and antero-posterior radiographs taken at 12 weeks after injury using validated software to objectively extract the size of peripheral callus from digital radiographs.Results: The nail group had 2.4 times more callus area per location(233±280 mm2) than the plate group(95±109 mm2,P=0.028).Conclusion: Significantly less periosteal callus formed in fractures stabilized with locking plates than with IM nails.

Key concepts: Intramedullary rod, Medicine, Callus, Femur, Nail (fastener), Significant difference, Radiography, Anatomy

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Treatments of distal femur fractures with intramedullary nails and locking plates: the difference of callus formation — Research Paper | ScholarLens