2008•Di-Si Junyi Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Bioequivalence of Raberazole enteric-coated tablets in healthy volunteers

Hu Ben

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To compare the relative bioavailability of the Raberazole preparations-sample tablets and reference tablets. METHODS: Raberazole concentrations in plasma of 18 healthy young volunteers were determined after a single oral dose (20 mg) of two Raberazole preparations were given respectively to 18 voluteers in an open randomized standard two-stage crossover self-control test. The Raberazole concentration in plasma was assayed by the HPLC method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calcu-lated with 3p97 program by computer. RESULTS: Time for peak concentration (Tmax) was (4.3±1.4) and (4.3±1.1) h, half life time (T1/2) was (1.5±0.4) and (1.4±0.4) h, peak concentration (Cmax) was (505±169) and (466±182) μg/L, 0→12 h area under the curve [AUC(0→12 h)] was (1365±454) and (1263±485) μg·h /L, 0→∞ area under the curve (AUC0→∞) was (1399±471) and (1295±486) μg·h/L. The relative bioavailability of Raberazole sample tablets compared with the contrast tablets was 111.1%. CONCLUSION: The two preparations are bioequivalent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To compare the relative bioavailability of the Raberazole preparations-sample tablets and reference tablets. METHODS: Raberazole concentrations in plasma of 18 healthy young volunteers were determined after a single oral dose (20 mg) of two Raberazole preparations were given respectively to 18 voluteers in an open randomized standard two-stage crossover self-control test. The Raberazole concentration in plasma was assayed by the HPLC method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calcu-lated with 3p97 program by computer. RESULTS: Time for peak concentration (Tmax) was (4.3±1.4) and (4.3±1.1) h, half life time (T1/2) was (1.5±0.4) and (1.4±0.4) h, peak concentration (Cmax) was (505±169) and (466±182) μg/L, 0→12 h area under the curve [AUC(0→12 h)] was (1365±454) and (1263±485) μg·h /L, 0→∞ area under the curve (AUC0→∞) was (1399±471) and (1295±486) μg·h/L. The relative bioavailability of Raberazole sample tablets compared with the contrast tablets was 111.1%. CONCLUSION: The two preparations are bioequivalent.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To compare the relative bioavailability of the Raberazole preparations-sample tablets and reference tablets. METHODS: Raberazole concentrations in plasma of 18 healthy young volunteers were determined after a single oral dose (20 mg) of two Raberazole preparations were given respectively to 18 voluteers in an open randomized standard two-stage crossover self-control test. The Raberazole concentration in plasma was assayed by the HPLC method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calcu-lated with 3p97 program by computer. RESULTS: Time for peak concentration (Tmax) was (4.3±1.4) and (4.3±1.1) h, half life time (T1/2) was (1.5±0.4) and (1.4±0.4) h, peak concentration (Cmax) was (505±169) and (466±182) μg/L, 0→12 h area under the curve [AUC(0→12 h)] was (1365±454) and (1263±485) μg·h /L, 0→∞ area under the curve (AUC0→∞) was (1399±471) and (1295±486) μg·h/L. The relative bioavailability of Raberazole sample tablets compared with the contrast tablets was 111.1%. CONCLUSION: The two preparations are bioequivalent.

Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Cmax, Pharmacokinetics, Crossover study, Plasma concentration, High-performance liquid chromatography, Chromatography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioequivalence of Raberazole enteric-coated tablets in healthy volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens