2012Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General SurgeryRequires access

Diagnostic/Therapy value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in obstructive jaundice

Jing Tang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)in the diagnosis/therapy of obstructive jaundice.Methods: A total of 75 patients with obstructive jaundice were investigated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP),and compared with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP).Results: The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP and MRCP was 84.0%(63/75) and 53.3%(40/75),respectively.The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP in investigating the etiology of obstructive jaundice was significantly higher than that of MRCP(P0.05).The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP and MRCP in the detection of choledocholithiasis-induced obstructive jaundice was 92.1%(35/38) and 78.9%(30/38),respectively,without significant differences between the two examinations(P0.05).But The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP in investigating the etiology of non-choledocholithiasis-induced obstructive jaundice was significantly higher than that of MRCP(P0.05).The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP and MRCP in the detection of non-choledocholithiasis-induced obstructive jaundice was 84.0%(63/75) and 53.3%(40/75),respectively.And There were 10 patients choledocholithiasis-induced obstructive jaundice that were cured by ERCP.Conclusion: MRCP cannot take the place of ERCP as regards identification of biliary obstruction And for some patients with obstructive jaundice has a therapeutic effect.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To evaluate the application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)in the diagnosis/therapy of obstructive jaundice.Methods: A total of 75 patients with obstructive jaundice were investigated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP),and compared with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP).Results: The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP and MRCP was 84.0%(63/75) and 53.3%(40/75),respectively.The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP in investigating the etiology of obstructive jaundice was significantly higher than that of MRCP(P0.05).The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP and MRCP in the detection of choledocholithiasis-induced obstructive jaundice was 92.1%(35/38) and 78.9%(30/38),respectively,without significant differences between the two examinations(P0.05).But The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP in investigating the etiology of non-choledocholithiasis-induced obstructive jaundice was significantly higher than that of MRCP(P0.05).The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP and MRCP in the detection of non-choledocholithiasis-induced obstructive jaundice was 84.0%(63/75) and 53.3%(40/75),respectively.And There were 10 patients choledocholithiasis-induced obstructive jaundice that were cured by ERCP.Conclusion: MRCP cannot take the place of ERCP as regards identification of biliary obstruction And for some patients with obstructive jaundice has a therapeutic effect.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To evaluate the application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)in the diagnosis/therapy of obstructive jaundice.Methods: A total of 75 patients with obstructive jaundice were investigated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP),and compared with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP).Results: The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP and MRCP was 84.0%(63/75) and 53.3%(40/75),respectively.The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP in investigating the etiology of obstructive jaundice was significantly higher than that of MRCP(P0.05).The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP and MRCP in the detection of choledocholithiasis-induced obstructive jaundice was 92.1%(35/38) and 78.9%(30/38),respectively,without significant differences between the two examinations(P0.05).But The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP in investigating the etiology of non-choledocholithiasis-induced obstructive jaundice was significantly higher than that of MRCP(P0.05).The diagnostic accuracy of ERCP and MRCP in the detection of non-choledocholithiasis-induced obstructive jaundice was 84.0%(63/75) and 53.3%(40/75),respectively.And There were 10 patients choledocholithiasis-induced obstructive jaundice that were cured by ERCP.Conclusion: MRCP cannot take the place of ERCP as regards identification of biliary obstruction And for some patients with obstructive jaundice has a therapeutic effect.

Key concepts: Medicine, Obstructive jaundice, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, Jaundice, Etiology, Radiology, Diagnostic accuracy

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnostic/Therapy value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in obstructive jaundice — Research Paper | ScholarLens