2012•Journal of Beijing Institute of TechnologyRequires access

Three-stage DEA Model's Efficiency of Service Industry

Zang Xiaopeng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The paper evaluates the efficiency of service industry in 31 provinces of China in 2009 by three-stage DEA model.The empirical results are as follows: firstly,service industry's operation efficiency has a remarkable relationship with human capital,technical innovation and government's support;secondly,if the effects of exogenous environment variables and random shocks are not controlled,the pure technical efficiency of 31 provinces will be underestimated,and scale efficiency value will be often overestimated;thirdly,due to lack of pure technical efficiency,the technical efficiency of 31 provinces with the average of 0.520 is low;moreover,China can be divided into four types according to pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency;lastly,the efficiency of service industry in East,Central and West China differs wildly,that is to say,the one in East China is the best and the one in West China is the worst.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper evaluates the efficiency of service industry in 31 provinces of China in 2009 by three-stage DEA model.The empirical results are as follows: firstly,service industry's operation efficiency has a remarkable relationship with human capital,technical innovation and government's support;secondly,if the effects of exogenous environment variables and random shocks are not controlled,the pure technical efficiency of 31 provinces will be underestimated,and scale efficiency value will be often overestimated;thirdly,due to lack of pure technical efficiency,the technical efficiency of 31 provinces with the average of 0.520 is low;moreover,China can be divided into four types according to pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency;lastly,the efficiency of service industry in East,Central and West China differs wildly,that is to say,the one in East China is the best and the one in West China is the worst.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper evaluates the efficiency of service industry in 31 provinces of China in 2009 by three-stage DEA model.The empirical results are as follows: firstly,service industry's operation efficiency has a remarkable relationship with human capital,technical innovation and government's support;secondly,if the effects of exogenous environment variables and random shocks are not controlled,the pure technical efficiency of 31 provinces will be underestimated,and scale efficiency value will be often overestimated;thirdly,due to lack of pure technical efficiency,the technical efficiency of 31 provinces with the average of 0.520 is low;moreover,China can be divided into four types according to pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency;lastly,the efficiency of service industry in East,Central and West China differs wildly,that is to say,the one in East China is the best and the one in West China is the worst.

Key concepts: China, Government (linguistics), Service (business), Value (mathematics), Scale (ratio), Tertiary sector of the economy, Capital (architecture), Industrial organization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Three-stage DEA Model's Efficiency of Service Industry — Research Paper | ScholarLens